Home
/
Blog
/
Developer Insights
/
How to become a better developer: Top tips from 15 industry leaders

How to become a better developer: Top tips from 15 industry leaders

Author
Rohit C P
Calendar Icon
January 3, 2017
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Explore this post with:

Last week when I sharedThe top programming languages that will be mostpopular in 2017, the frequent comment was, what does it take to be a better developer?

I’ve met some amazing developers in real life and through React Native Community, and I decided to ask them, “How do I become a better developer?” Thank you to everyone who took the time to answer these questions with passion!

This is a compilation of answers I received from them. Some of these quotes are not limited to answers from that specific question.

Interviewees / Current Position

  • Aravind Kumaraguru (Engineering Director @Pioneers in Engineering)
  • Brent Vatne (Front-end Developer @Exponent)
  • Charlie Cheever (Co-founder @Exponent)
  • Christopher Chedeau (Front-end Engineer @Facebook)
  • Dan Horrigan (Senior Back-end Developer @Futuri Media)
  • Frank W. Zammetti (Lead Architect @BNY Mellon)
  • Janic Duplessis (Co-founder @App & Flow)
  • Jake Murzy (Co-founder @commitocracy)
  • Jun Ho Hwang (Software Engineer @Coupang)
  • Keon Kim (Machine Learning Maniac @NYU)
  • Munseok Oh (Co-founder and CTO @Sketchware)
  • Satyajit Sahoo (UX Lead @ Glucosio & Front-end Engineer @Callstack.io)
  • Sonny Lazuardi Hermawan (Engineer @Sale Stock)
  • Sunggu Hwang (CTO @ScatterLab)
  • Timothy Ko (Software Engineer @Snapchat)


Q&A

Aravind Kumaraguru

Aravind is an undergrad at UC Berkeley pursuing a degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and is Engineering Director for the nonprofit organization Pioneers in Engineering.

Q: How do you think I can become a better developer?

A: Obviously, never stay complacent with what you know – this field changes ridiculously fast, and you need to keep up with it. Follow along with the news in the tech industry, perhaps read up on some source code for a Python module that you recently used.

A friend of mine had some free time over winter break, so he decided to teach himself Django and build a webapp that he could interact with over SMS. It’s sort of a toy project, but he really enjoyed learning the different development paradigms. For context, he specializes in embedded systems and robotics, so this is nowhere near his comfort zone.

But pushing yourself to try different things will make you much stronger as an engineer. I personally wish I had done more web stuff before this year – in my organization (PiE), we’re developing a new iteration of a robotics kit to be used by high school students. While I have a good grasp of the low-level and systems stuff, I’m at a loss when it comes managing our UI design. Never had an interest in doing that type of stuff full-time, but having even a surface-level knowledge can be immensely helpful

Q: Do you have any projects you did to push yourself out of your comfort zone?

A: I built an automated door opener last summer, which operated a mechanical lever to open a door when an RFID card was scanned. The project used a really powerful motor and a mess of sensors to track the state of the arm, which proved to be quite difficult to coordinate. I learned real quick that I would need to do a bunch of offline testing before running my code on the device, which was very different from what I was used to up till then.

In terms of academics, I just finished CS 189, which was a massive crash course in data science, optimization, and probability theory. The programming I did in that class was also very different from what I’m used to, even though it was all in Python.


Brent Vatne

Brent is Front-end web/mobile developer working on Exponent and React Native. He contributes to tons of open-source projects.

Q: I really want to become a better developer; what would you say the first step is?

A: Do stuff you’re excited about and contribute to open source projects:-D

Q: How old are you and how much experience do you have as a programmer?

A: I am 30 years old, and very much 😮

Q: How did you join Exponent? What was the cause?

A: James (ide) and I were the most active contributors to a react-native outside of facebook and so we spoke a lot. He created exponent with Charlie. I ended up doing some consulting work with them and Charlie asked if I’d be interested in working with them full time and year, it was lots of fun so I joined.

Q: I should know objective C and Java thoroughly before I jump into React Native, right?

A: You can learn it as you go if you need to. there’s also tons of pure javascript stuff that need to be done. and documentation. lots of things 🙂


Charlie Cheever

Charlie Cheever is the co-founder of Quora, an online knowledge market. He was formerly an engineer and manager at Facebook, where he oversaw the creation of Facebook Connect and the Facebook Platform. Prior to Facebook, Cheever was employed by Amazon.com in Seattle. He left Facebook to start Quora in June 2009 to work on Exponent.

Q: What’s the motivation of Exponent being free and Open Source?

A: I really want to make something that like a 12-year-old version of me would use. So, someone who doesn’t know tons about programming but can learn new things and doesn’t have a credit card or lots of money, but has time and creativity and a phone and friends. I learned to program making calculator games on TI-85, it’s sad to me that kids can’t make stuff on their phones today.

Q: Why did you leave Quora?

A: I managed the mobile teams there and it was so slow to work on those apps even tho we had good people, I found it so frustrating And after I left I tried to build some mobile stuff and it was so annoying that I decided there needed to be a different way to make stuff. So James and I made something like react Native called Ion. It was strikingly similar actually. But React Native already had android support and 20 people working on it, and we had 2 people. So we decided to make everything else around it that we wanted to make!

Q: What did you do on Facebook?

A: I made the developer platform that all those games like FarmVille were on. Well, not all of it obviously but was one of two main developers. And I worked on the first version of facebook video, then did a lot of random other things. Then was a manager and did log in with Facebook on other sites, and then left to do Quora.

How to monetize your programming skills


Christopher Chedeau

Christopher has been working at Facebook as a Front-end Engineer for about 5 years. Previously, he worked at Curse Network.

Q: What do you do on Facebook?

A: I was on the photos team when I started, then I discovered React and started adopting and promoting it both internally and externally. I was there at the beginning of reacting native and pushed it through until 3 months ago. I just recently switched to the Nuclide team. I’m still #3 contributor on React Native.😛

Q: Do you have any prior work experience?

A: I was working for Curse (doing website for blizzard games) during my college to pay for it. It was fun to see the company go from 5 people in a guild to a 100 people company.

Q: What’s your day to day like on Facebook? The current project you’re working on?

A: I’m currently working on the Nuclide team, Facebook’s IDE built on top of Atom. I would say my time is spent half coding, half cheerleading all the cool stuff people are doing inside of FB.

Q: How do you think one can become a better developer?

A: I think that there are multiple levels.

The first level is mastering all the concepts. For example yesterday I had to write a function that removes certain keys from a big nested object. Because I’ve done this task so many times in the past, I was able to implement it in one go without even thinking and it worked the first time. For this one, exercises are really good. You want to code the same kind of things many many times to train your muscle memory.

The second level is how do you build things in a way that are not going to break in the future. Ideally, once you build something, you can move to the next thing and it’ll keep working without you there. This is challenging when there’s a ton of developers touching the codebase and product directions changing often.

Finally, the third level is how do you prevent a whole class of problems from even existing in the first place. A good example is with manual dom mutations, it’s very easy to trigger some code that interacts with a dom node that has been removed from the dom. React came in and made this problem go away. You have to go out of your way to do so, and even if you want to do those things, you have the tools to make it work: lifecycle events.

Q: Is there something you wish you’d known or learned earlier as a programmer?

A: Probably the most important thing is: tradeoffs, tradeoffs, tradeoffs. They are everywhere.

If you are working on some random throwaway feature that no one is going to use, who cares if the code is maintainable, you need it to work and now one mistake I see a lot is that people over-engineer the easy things but are not willing to make their architecture less clean from a CS perspective even though it actually provides the user experience you need.

At the end of the day, we write all this code for the users, we should first understand what the user experience should be and then do whatever it takes to get it. If the user just needs to display some content and needs to be able to edit it easily, just install WordPress, pick a good looking theme and call it a day

– Btw, pro-tip, if you want to be successful, always think about the value you are providing. If you are earning $100k a year, this means that the company should be making $200k because you’re here


Dan Horrigan

Dan is a Senior Back-end developer @Futuri Media. He has 20 years of programming experience in many different languages. He’s been contributing to React Native early/mid-2015.

Q: What’s your background as a programmer?

A: I started learning to program (with QBasic) when I was 11 and was hooked. I learned everything I could, as fast as I could. I learned a few languages like Visual Basic and started to dabble with C and C++. Then I found web development and dove in head first. First, learning HTML and CSS, then adding simple CGI scripts written in Perl, and eventually Classic ASP.

My first paying project was when I was 14: A website for the company my dad worked for, with a customer portal to let them see their job progress. This was all in ASP. After that, I started learning PHP, and have been using that as my language of choice ever since. However, I picked up a lot of experience with other languages along the way: JS, Python, Ruby (on Rails), Java, C#, Go, Objective-C.

Q: What are some projects you’re currently working on?

A: I work for Future Media (http://futurimedia.com). We provide SaaS solutions for Broadcast Radio and TV companies. We provide white label mobile applications, social engagement and discovery, audio streaming and podcast solutions, etc. I haven’t had much free time lately to contribute to many OSS projects, but hope to change that soon!

Currently, I am a Senior Back-End Web Developer, but I am transitioning into being the Director of Technical Operations.

Q: Is there something you wish you’d learned or knew earlier as a developer?

A: I wished I would have realized earlier in my career that it is OK to be wrong, and that failure is just a chance to learn.

Q: What’s the first step to becoming a good developer?

A: Come up with a small-ish project that you think would be cool, or would make your life easier, and just jump right in. Too many people try to learn without a goal other than “I want to learn to code.” Without a goal, you are just reading docs or copy/pasting from tutorials…you can’t learn that way.

To become a better developer, you need to do one simple thing: Never. Stop. Learning. Read other people’s code, figure out how that one app does that really cool thing you saw, read blogs, etc. No matter how good you are, or think you are, there is always someone better, and always more to learn.

Q: Is there a certain project you’re currently interested in? Next on your learning list?

A: I have been using, and occasionally contributing to, React Native since early/mid-2015, and continue to be interested in it.

Next, on my learning list is learning Erlang/Elixir. We build heavily distributed systems where I work and think we would really benefit from a language like that.


Frank W. Zammetti

Frank is a lead architect for BNY Mellon by day and the author of eight books on various programming topics for Apress by night

Q: How do I become a better developer?

A: I get asked this question quite a bit both at work from junior developers and from readers of my books. I always give the same answer: make games!

It sounds like a joke answer, but it most definitely is not! Games have a unique ability to touch on so many software engineering topics that you can’t help but learn things from the experience. Whether it’s choosing proper data structures and algorithms, or writing optimized code (without getting lost in micro-optimizations – at least too soon), or various forms of AI, it’s all stuff that is more broadly applicable outside of games. You frequently deal with network coding, obviously audio and visual coding (which tends to open your mind to mathematical concepts you otherwise might not be), efficient I/O and of course overall architecture, which has to be clean and efficient in games (and for many games, extensible). All those topics and more are things that come into play (hehe) when making games.

It also teaches you debugging and defensive programming techniques extremely well because one thing people don’t accept in games is errors. It’s kind of ironic actually: people will deal with some degree of imperfection in their banking website but show a single glitch in a game and they hate it! You have no choice but to write solid code in a game and you figure out what works and what doesn’t, how to recover from unexpected conditions, how to spot edge cases, all of that. It all comes into play and those are skills that developers need generally and which I find are most frequently lacking in many developers.

It doesn’t matter one bit if the game you produce is any good, or whether anyone else ever even plays it. It doesn’t matter if it’s web-based (even if your day job is), or mobile, doesn’t matter what technologies you use. The type of insight and problem-solving skills you build and tune when creating games will serve you well no matter what your day job is, even in ways that are far from obvious.

I’ve been programming games for the better part of 35 years now. No, none of them have been best-sellers or won awards or anything like that. In fact, it’s a safe bet that most people wouldn’t have even heard of my games, even the one’s still available today. None of that matters because the experience of building them is far and away the most rewarding part of it. Perhaps the best thing about programming games is that they are, by their nature, fun! You’re creating something that’s intended to be enjoyable so the process of creating it should absolutely be just as enjoyable. How many things can you do that are really fun while still being challenging and simultaneously help build the skills needed for a long career?

So yeah, make games, that’s my simple two-word answer!

Q: Is there something you wish you’d known or learned earlier as a programmer?

A: Hmm, tough question actually. I guess if there was one thing (and I’ll cheat and combine two things here because they’re related) I would say that early on I didn’t understand two very important phrases: “As simple as possible, but no simpler” and “Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good”.

I have a natural perfectionist mentality, so I spend a lot of time pondering architecture, API design, etc. I once spent 33 hours straight working on a Commodore 64 demo because ONE lousy pixel was out of place and my perfectionist brain just couldn’t live with it! Sometimes, I have to force myself to say “okay, it’s good enough, you’ve planned enough, now get to work and actually BUILD stuff and refactor it later if needed”, or I have to force myself to say “okay, it basically does what it’s supposed to, it doesn’t need to be absolutely flawless because nobody but me is even going to notice”. Especially when you’ve got deadlines and people relying on you, you have to make sure you’re working towards concrete goals and not constantly getting stuck trying to achieve perfection because you rarely are going to, at least initially anyway, no matter how hard you plan or try – and the dirty little secret in IT is that perfection rarely matters anyway! Good enough is frequently, err, good enough 🙂

And, your design/development approach should always strive to be as absolutely simple as possible. Of course, what constitutes “simple” is debatable and doesn’t necessarily even always have the same meaning from project to project, but for me some key metrics are how many dependencies I have (web development today is a NIGHTMARE in this regard – less is GENERALLY better) and how many layers of abstraction there are. Developers, especially in the Java world, like to abstract everything and they do so under the assumption that it’s more flexible. But if there’s one thing I’ve learned over the years it’s that the way to write flexible code is to write simple code. It’s better than abstractions and extension points and that sort of stuff because it’s just far easier to understand the consequences of your changes.

As a corollary, a terse code is NOT simpler code! Simple code is code that anyone can quickly understand, even less capable developers, and even yourself years after. Terse and “clever” code tends to be the exact opposite. Often times, the more verbose code is actually simpler because there are fewer assumptions and often less knowledge needed to understand it, less “code hoping” you have to do to follow things. Related to this is that writing less code isn’t AUTOMATICALLY better. No, you shouldn’t re-invent the wheel, but you also shouldn’t be AFRAID to invent a marginally better the wheel when it makes sense. Knowing the difference is hard of course and comes from experience, but if you think it’s ALWAYS better to write less code then you’re going to make your life harder in the long run.

Of course, don’t over-simplify code either. Too simple and suddenly extending it almost MUST mean a refactor. You never want to completely refactor because you HAVE to in order to build an app over time. There’s a balance that’s difficult to strike but it should always be the goal.

Oh yeah, and I wish I knew how to express myself in fewer words… but actually, I’m still obviously working on that one 🙂


Janic Duplessis

Janic is the co-founder of App & Flow, a react-native contributor, and open-source contributor.

Q: Any tips to becoming a better developer?

A: Don’t think there’s anything in particular, you just have keep learning and getting out of your comfort zone. Like trying a new language or framework from time to time. At least that’s what I do but I’m pretty sure there are some other good ways haha 🙂

Q: How can I start contributing to React Native?

A: The best is to start with something small like a bug fix or adding a small feature like an extra prop on a component. Most contributors know either iOS or Android and a bit of JS. There are also some JS devs that work on things like the package and clip. We keep some issues with a Good First Task label that should be a good place to start


Jake Murzy

Jake is an Open-source Archaeologist. He writes buzzword compliant code. Co-founder at @commitocracy.

Q: Hey Jake, any tips to becoming a better programmer? 🙂

A: Number one thing you should do is to learn your tools before you learn the language you work in because it will lead to faster feedback loops and you will get to experience more in less time. So install a linter and it will catch most of your errors as you type. It statically analyzes your code and recommends best practices to follow. You should always follow best practices until you gain enough experience to start questioning them.


Jun Ho Hwang

Jun is a software engineer at Coupang, which is the $5 Billion Startup Filling Amazon’s Void In South Korea. He is a very friendly developer who loves to connect.

Q: How do you become a better developer?

A: The word ‘better’ can be described in various ways–especially in the field of programming. A good developer could be someone who is exceptionally talented in development, someone who is amazing at communicating, or someone who understands Business very well. I personally think a “good” developer is someone who is in the middle–a person who can solve his or her business problem with their development skills, and communicate with others about the issue. Ultimately, to achieve this, it requires a lot of practice, and I recommend you to create your own service. Looking and thinking from the perspective of the user and improving the service to fulfill their needs really helps you grow as a better developer.

Q: Is there something you wish you’d known or learned earlier as a developer?

A: I really wish I started my own service earlier on. The hardest thing to grasp before developing is realizing how you can apply what you learned. Many developers are afraid to start a “service” because it sounds difficult; however, pondering about what to make and where to start, and then connecting those points of thought help you grow as a better developer.

Q: What do you do at Coupang? What are you currently working on?

A: Coupling provides a rocket-delivery-service, and I am working on developing a system called “Coupling Car,” which is related to insurance and monetary management. Furthermore, I’m thinking about adding transportation control system and the ability to analyze data from the log.


Keon Kim

Keon is a student at NYU who is really passionate about Machine Learning. He is a very active GitHub member who tries to contribute to open source projects related to machine learning.

Q: What are your interests? What kind of projects have you worked on?

A: I’ve been working on machine learning projects these days. I am one of the project members of DeepCoding Project, a project with a goal of translating written English to the source code. I’ve been contributing to a C++ machine learning framework called my pack(https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack), which is equivalent to skit-learn in Python.

I’ve also done some fun side projects: DeepStock (https://github.com/keonkim/deepstock) project is an attempt to predict the stock market trends by analyzing daily news headlines. CodeGAN (https://github.com/keonkim/CodeGAN) is a source code generator that uses one of the new deep learning methods called SeqGAN.

Q: How do you become a better developer?

A: I think it is really important to understand the basics. By basics, I mean math, data structures, and algorithms. Deep learning is really hot right now, and I see people jumping into learning it without basic knowledge in computer science and mathematics. And of course, most of them give up as soon as mathematical notations appear in the tutorial. I know this because I was one of them and it took me really long time to understand some concepts that students with a strong fundamentals could understand in a fraction of the time I spent. New languages, libraries, and frameworks are introduced literally every day these days, and you need the fundamentals in order to keep up with them.


Munseok Oh

Munseok is a Full-stack developer and CTO at Sketchware. He previously worked at System Integration for ~7 years.

Q: How do I become a better developer?

A: When I was very young and cocky, I evaluated other developers based on their coding style. There were certain criteria they had to pass in order for me to judge them as a good developer. But now, I really don’t think that way. Now, I believe that every developer is progressive, which means he or she is becoming a better developer every day. It doesn’t really matter if the style is bad or code is good–as long as the program runs, I think it’s great! Whether the program has room for growth or has bugs, I think the motivation to develop is what really matters. Developers usually are never satisfied with their skills. They are always eager to become better–probably why you’re doing this. It’s really hard to justify “good developer”. People like you will become better than me in no time. I still don’t think I am a good developer.

Q: What was the most difficult thing when you were developing Sketchware?

A: Developing Sketchware wasn’t too difficult because we had a good blueprint for the item. The direction was very clear for us to follow, so developing it was a breeze. However, there was a line we had to maintain for Sketchware–this line had two conditions:

  1. Sketchware must be an easy tool for anyone to create applications.
  2. Whatever the user takes away from Sketchware can be applied in their future career

Since we wanted Sketchware to be an efficient tool that can help users learn programming concepts, I am very considerate and think a lot when it comes to adding new features in the application.

Q: As a developer, is there something you wish you knew or fixed earlier?

A: I really wish I jumped into the Start-up world earlier. When it comes to developing, you need to be passionate and really enjoy what you do. Even if you pull 3 all-nighters, ponder all day long about a new algorithm, or stress about a new bug, everything will be okay if you’re enjoying it. It really goes back to the question #1–I get my energy from the joy I have when I develop, and that joy eventually makes you a better developer. When life hits you, most developers lose the passion for developing if you think of it as work. I used to be like that. But now, I’m really not worried–since developing brings joy to me now. Even if we run out of funds or our company burns down, it’s really okay since I am making the most out of what I am doing.


Satyajit Sahoo

Satyajit is the UX Lead at Glucosio, and Front-end Engineer at Callstack.io. He is an amazing open-source contributor; he is one of the top 5 contributors in React Native

Q: What is your background as a programmer?

A: I don’t really come from a programming background. I did my graduation in Forestry. I left post-graduation after getting a job offer and never looked back.

Q: What’s your day like on day to day basis?

A: It’s pretty boring. I wake up, order some breakfast online or go out, then start office work. In evening I go out to a bar or take a long walk if there’s enough time left. At night I mostly watch TV series or hack on side-projects.

Q: Motivation behind contributing to open source projects?

A: I’ve been involved in Open Source for a long time. When I was doing my graduation I got into Linux and got introduced to the world of Open Source. I loved it how we could learn so much from other projects. It fascinated me that developers were selfless to let us see and use the there code for free (mostly). I did a lot of Open Source projects in form of themes and apps during my college days, and it always made me happy when people forked them and changed to meet their needs, and send pull requests to fix things.

As a developer, I contribute to Open Source projects most of the time because I need a feature, or it improves something on a project I love. I think it’s better if we work together to fix stuff that is important to us rather than just filing issues.

Q: How do I become a better developer?

A: I think it’s important that we are open to new things. There’s a lot to learn, and we cannot learn if we stay in our bubble. Try new things, even if you think you can’t do it, even it looks complex on the surface. I have failed to do things so many times, but eventually succeed. In the process, I understand the problem and the solution, and then it becomes really simple.


Sonny Lazuardi Hermawan

Sonny is a JavaScript Full Stack Engineer, a React & React Native player, and an Open source enthusiast. He currently works as an Engineer at Sale Stock.

Q: How do you become a better developer?

A: I think always eager to learn is the key. Try everything, make mistakes, and learn from that mistakes. I agree that code review from partners and senior engineers will make our code better. Try publishing your own open source projects, meet other great developers and learn from them.

Q: What’s your motivation behind creating open source projects?

A: I just want the people to know about our idea, and try implementing it so that others can use our project. I’m really inspired by people that work on open source projects that used by many devs such as Dan Abramov that created redux.


Sunggu Hwang

Sunggu worked at Daum Communications for 4 years. Then, he left Daum to work at Scatter Lab as the CTO. This is his 5th year at Scatter Lab.

Q: How do you become a better developer?

A: Hmm… Becoming a good developer… Every developer has his or her own personality when it comes to programming. As an analogy, think about blacksmiths! Not all blacksmiths are alike–some enjoy crafting the best sword, while some might enjoy testing out the sword more than crafting it. I am a thinker–who plans and organizes thoughts before I carry out an action. I think a good developer knows how to write concise and clean code; you should practice this habit. Even though the trend for programming is always changing, and many people use different languages, write a piece of code that anyone can understand without comments.

Q: What do you think is the next BIG thing?

A: I’ve observed the evolution of programming languages, and I think it’s becoming more abstract every generation–procedural programming, imperative programming, functional programming… I think in the future, maybe in about 20 to 30 years, we will live in the time where the computer writes the code for us, and we just put them together like legos.

Q: What should I focus on studying?

A: I think deep learning is a must. Try different tutorials and learn it with passion. Math, algorithms–anything will help you in the long run.


Timothy Ko

Timothy is a software engineer at Snapchat. He previously worked at many places such as Riot Games, Square, etc.

Q: What do you do at Snapchat?

A: I’m a software engineer on the monetization team, so I work on anything related to making money. Some example projects are Snapchat Discover, a news platform within the iOS and Android apps; Ad Manager, a control panel used by sales and ad operations to flight ads; Ads API, which allows third-party partners to integrate their own ad platforms into Snapchat. Also, I was a past intern at Snapchat so I occasionally give talks and Q&As to upcoming interns. I’m also heavily invested in hiring and conduct a lot of interviews there.

Q: What do you do on a day-to-day basis?

A: What I’ve mentioned previously. Also, even after I pass on the work to other people, sometimes I have to go back and help support it or be part of the technical discussions on future changes. When new people join the team, usually I’m the one to ramp people up on how the code base looks like the kinds of frameworks we use, how a typical engineer workflow looks like, etc.

Q: What languages/framework do you guys mostly use?

A: For server code, it’s usually Java and for UI we use React Redux. Most teams work in google app engine, which is why we use Java, but some teams switch it up a little bit due to some app engine limitations. And of course, the product teams work in objective C for iOS and Java for Android.

Q: How do you think I can become a better developer?

A: I think the best thing to do is to do as many things as possible. I did seven internships while in school so I already had two years of work experience before I graduated. Work experience is super important because coding in a hackathon, doing personal projects, and doing school assignments are totally different than working with enterprise software and apps with real users. But you have to start somewhere, so that’s where going to school, doing personal projects, and competing in hackathons comes in. And while at work, I think the best way to succeed is to ask lots of questions and learn by doing. You can read and study all you want, but you might not understand what’s going on until you actually do it. Another thing is code reviews — you can do so much knowledge transfer by having a more senior engineer tear your code apart and tell you how to make it better. Also, if you ever come up with a proposal on how to solve a problem, getting a tech lead to bombard you with hard questions forces you to make sure you have every little detail covered.


*The article was originally posted by Sung Park on Github*

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Rohit C P
Calendar Icon
January 3, 2017
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

HR Hiring Tools: The Essential Tech Stack for Modern Recruitment Teams

Are your HR systems actually helping your team move faster, or quietly slowing everything down behind the scenes? If your tech feels more like a burden than a boost, you’re far from alone. 

In fact, only 35% of HR leaders say their current approach is truly benefiting the business. This means the majority are dealing with tools that promise efficiency but deliver complexity instead. And the consequences are expensive, frustrating, and hard to ignore. 

Here’s what’s really happening within HR teams today:

Your HR tech stack doesn't have to be fragmented or underutilized. Simplify your systems and bring your processes together with solutions that actually fit how your team works.

In this article, we’ll break down exactly what these HR hiring tools are, why modern teams depend on them, and how you can choose the right ones.

What are HR Hiring Tools and Why Do You Need Them?

HR hiring tools are software products designed to support teams in finding, attracting, selecting, and hiring talent. These tools replace manual spreadsheets and repetitive admin work with structured workflows. They pull data from multiple sources, automate repetitive tasks, and give hiring teams insights they couldn’t see before.

Some tools help broadcast job postings widely. Others score candidate skills, schedule interviews painlessly, or help teams make decisions using analytics. When your recruiting team uses hiring tools for HR, they gain speed without losing control.

The benefits of using HR hiring tools

In 2025, nearly 7 in 10 employers reported difficulty filling full‑time roles. Top AI-powered hiring tools for HR help teams overcome these challenges through structured, predictable workflows.

Here’s what the best employee hiring HR tools help you accomplish:

  • Eliminate repetitive manual work for recruiters: From interview scheduling to follow-ups and candidate communication, automation handles administrative tasks that previously took hours. 
  • Reduce time-to-hire: AI-powered hiring tools automate the most time-consuming stages of recruitment, from resume screening to interview scheduling, significantly cutting hiring timelines. What once took weeks now happens in minutes, helping teams move faster in competitive talent markets without sacrificing quality.
  • Screen and shortlist candidates at scale: Instead of manually reviewing hundreds of resumes, AI tools instantly parse, rank, and shortlist candidates based on role-specific criteria. 
  • Improve quality of hire with data-driven matching: Modern hiring tools use skills-based and contextual analysis to match candidates more precisely to roles. For example, over 36% of organizations say using AI in recruiting helps reduce hiring and interviewing costs, and 24% report it improves their ability to identify top candidates.
  • Deliver a consistent and engaging candidate experience: AI chatbots and automated workflows ensure candidates receive timely responses, status updates, and interview coordination, 24/7. This reduces drop-offs, improves engagement, and creates a more professional, structured hiring journey.
  • Reduce bias and improve hiring fairness: When implemented correctly, AI hiring tools standardize evaluation criteria and minimize unconscious bias in early-stage screening. 
  • Lower cost per hire and improved efficiency: Automation reduces dependency on manual effort, external agencies, and prolonged hiring cycles, bringing down cost per hire by up to 30%. At scale, this translates into significant operational savings for HR teams.

Top HR Hiring Tools Every Recruitment Team Needs

Your technology setup shapes every outcome that matters for your agency. According to Deloitte, 56% of organizations see AI as a way to improve productivity and efficiency in talent acquisition, highlighting how critical the right tech has become.

A strong tech stack gives you the foundation for data-driven decisions by helping you track the full candidate journey from first contact to successful placement, so you can clearly see what is working and where you are losing momentum.

Here are some of the top HR hiring tools every recruitment team needs:

1. Candidate sourcing and job posting tools

These tools help you find and attract talent from multiple channels. And yes, HackerEarth is definitely one of the platforms that belongs on this list, especially if you are serious about reaching high-quality technical talent where they already are.

HackerEarth

HackerEarth's homepage
Assess technical and soft skills

HackerEarth is an enterprise-grade platform built to help tech recruiters source, assess, and interview technical talent with both precision and scale. It goes beyond simple sourcing, bringing everything into one place so you can move from finding candidates to evaluating them and running interviews without switching tools. This makes a real difference for teams that are hiring fast but still care deeply about quality.

The platform comes with a library of over 40,000 questions across 1,000+ technical skills and more than 40 programming languages. You can assess candidates across roles like software engineering, full-stack development, data science, and machine learning. It also connects with ATS systems, so once you find the right candidates, you can move them forward without extra manual work.

HackerEarth also puts a strong focus on fair and secure assessments. It uses AI-powered proctoring features such as smart browser monitoring, tab-switch detection, and audio and video checks to reduce the risk of cheating. The AI Interview Agent takes the process a step further. It runs structured interviews using clear rubrics, adjusts questions based on candidate responses, and keeps the experience consistent for everyone. It also hides personal details so evaluations stay focused on skills, helping reduce bias naturally.

LinkedIn Recruiter

LinkedIn Recruiter homepage for sourcing candidates
LinkedIn Recruiter helps businesses find and hire top talent fast

LinkedIn Recruiter remains one of the most widely used sourcing platforms due to its massive candidate database. Recruiters can search through millions of active and passive professionals, apply advanced filters, and reach out directly using InMail. 

Many teams start with LinkedIn Recruiter as their first sourcing tool, though it is not as specialized for technical roles.

ZipRecruiter

Connect people to their next great opportunity
Make the right hire with ZipRecruiter

ZipRecruiter is a popular job board and recruiting platform that distributes your job openings to more than 100 partner job sites once you post them. Recruiters can use customizable job posting templates and then let their AI‑driven matching technology scan thousands of resumes and invite candidates who fit the role to apply right away. 

The platform includes features like TrafficBoost for urgent or hard‑to‑fill roles, and higher‑tier plans integrate with your existing ATS so candidate status stays up to date across systems. It also gives you access to hundreds of job templates if you want help writing good job descriptions quickly.

2. Applicant tracking systems (ATS)

Looking to keep track of your job applicants and stay on top of every step in the hiring process? An ATS can do that and a lot more. It helps recruiters organize applications, filter candidates, and review records so every decision feels clear and manageable.

These tools can help you with all of that:

Greenhouse

Save more and hire with confidence with Greenhouse
Save time, cut costs, and hire top talent confidently with Greenhouse

Greenhouse is a powerful ATS that works well for teams spread across countries and time zones. Recruiters use it to create structured interview plans and schedule interviews automatically, keeping everything aligned no matter where candidates or interviewers are located. 

Its integration with onboarding platforms allows candidate profiles to sync securely, reducing repetitive work while keeping information accurate and up to date.

Lever

Lever recruitment platform homepage showcasing AI-powered tools
Lever's AI-powered platform streamlines sourcing, tracking, and relationship building

Lever is an ATS and CRM tool designed for remote hiring teams that want to track, engage, and move candidates forward, no matter where they are. It helps with automated sourcing, structured interviews, and the management of candidate relationships, so teams can connect with talent more effectively.

The platform gives you a searchable talent database, AI-powered recommendations, and real-time analytics to help you make informed hiring decisions across distributed teams. It also supports remote and video interviews, so hiring teams can evaluate candidates without bringing them on site.

3. Candidate screening and assessment tools

Screening and assessment tools help you see what candidates can actually do before you bring them into interviews. 

These tools give recruiters clear insights into skills and problem-solving so the hiring process feels smarter and more focused.

Codility 

Codility platform homepage showcasing developer assessments
Revolutionize your recruitment process with Codility

Codility lets you evaluate developers with real engineering challenges that show how they debug, build, and improve code. Its task library includes algorithms, bug fixing, and domain-specific problems so you can get a full picture of a candidate’s technical ability. 

The platform runs in a secure browser-based IDE and provides detailed analytics on correctness, performance, and code quality. Additionally, automatic scoring saves time and helps recruiters maintain a high level of assessment rigor.

HackerRank

HackerRank technical assessment landing page
HackerRank certified assessments validate candidate coding skills 

HackerRank offers a library of more than 1,000 curated coding challenges across multiple difficulty levels, covering algorithms, data structures, SQL, and AI-related tasks. The platform provides automated scoring, detailed candidate performance reports, and AI-driven shortlisting to quickly highlight top performers. 

Live coding interviews can be conducted through CodePair’s collaborative IDE, and advanced proctoring monitors browser activity and flags suspicious behavior. It also integrates with major ATS systems, which helps streamline high-volume technical hiring.

TestGorilla

TestGorilla tech hiring homepage featuring AI assessments
Get hundreds of validated tests, AI scoring, and a global talent pool

Similarly, TestGorilla has a broad library of over 400 pre-validated tests covering technical, cognitive, and behavioral skills. You can combine up to five tests per assessment and add custom question types such as video, essay, multiple-choice, or file uploads. 

Its AI scoring accelerates evaluation, while anti-cheating measures such as webcam snapshots, full-screen monitoring, and audio recording keep tests fair. These features make it easier to filter candidates early and focus live interviews on those who truly fit the role.

4. AI-powered recruitment tools

These tools help hiring teams with data and insights while keeping the process fair, fast, and human. 

Each of the platforms below brings a different strength, from intelligent interviews to soft skills assessments and global talent matching.

HireVue

HireVue technical hiring platform featuring skills-first assessments
Streamline tech recruiting with AI

HireVue brings AI into conversations in ways that feel natural and human. Its AI Interviewer uses voice and data to help highlight candidates who can actually do the work you are hiring for. Recruiters often report big improvements in efficiency, such as around 60% less time spent screening and around 90% faster time to hire, and some teams see significant savings in cost per interview and annual hiring costs.

The platform’s agents support skills‑based hiring at scale for every role. Candidates also get a more respectful experience because the technology engages with them in a way that feels personal and adaptive rather than robotic.

Pymetrics

Log in to Pymetrics with username or email
Access your Pymetrics account 

Pymetrics uses neuroscience‑based, gamified assessments to measure factors such as risk tolerance, attention, and decision‑making. The results feed into AI‑powered matching that lines up candidate strengths with job profiles. 

Recruiters appreciate it because it helps broaden the range of talent they consider and brings forward people who may not show their potential on a resume alone.

Eightfold.ai

Explore Eightfold.ai’s AI talent platform shaping the future of work
Discover how Eightfold.ai pairs people’s potential with agentic AI

Calling itself a Talent Intelligence Platform, Eightfold AI uses a “Talent Intelligence Graph” to look across billions of career data points to match people to roles. You can use it to find external candidates and assess internal talent for reskilling and growth opportunities. 

Many companies use Eightfold’s platform for long‑term workforce planning and technical hiring because it can reveal patterns and potential that go beyond simple keyword matching.

5. Interviewing and assessment platforms

These tools let you move past resumes and see how candidates actually perform in real work scenarios. 

FaceCode (HackerEarth)

Run structured, collaborative interviews with FaceCode
Collaborate inside a shared code editor and connect via HD video

As part of the HackerEarth ecosystem, the FaceCode module lets you run structured coding sessions with real-time collaboration, notes, and auto-generated summaries. Diagram boards make system design discussions visual and easier for everyone to follow, and the platform supports panel interviews with up to five interviewers so teams can discuss both technical depth and teamwork without switching between tools.

FaceCode also records sessions and generates transcripts, which allows teams to revisit specific moments and compare candidates with a richer context. The ability to mask personal information adds a level of fairness that supports more inclusive hiring.

On the other hand, it fits into your existing workflows with integrations for tools like Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, and SAP, and it meets compliance standards such as GDPR and ISO 27001. HackerEarth also connects you to a global developer community of over 10 million, letting you use hackathons and hiring challenges to build a pipeline of engaged talent and reduce the time and cost of hiring.

Codility Live

Support standardized and free-flowing workflows with Codility Live
Expedite your hiring process with Codility Live

Codility Live gives you a space for seamless technical interviews that bring candidates and interviewers together in one session. The environment combines video chat, an IDE, pair programming, and whiteboard tools, enabling candidates to show their skills naturally.

Interviewers get features that support a smooth process while still letting them dig into logic, communication, problem-solving, and system design. It also comes with auto‑generated feedback reports that help hiring teams share thoughts quickly and stay aligned. You can even turn on AI support to observe how candidates work with generative tools in real time. 

6. Onboarding tools

Is getting new hires set up feeling messy and overwhelming? Onboarding tools simplify forms, compliance, and introductions so everything flows smoothly for HR and employees.

WorkBright

Onboard candidates in a quick, compliant, and 100% remote process
Streamline employee onboarding processes for businesses

WorkBright helps HR teams handle I‑9 verification and automated E‑Verify to get new employees started easily. The platform keeps all compliance documents in one place, which helps reduce manual work and keeps records audit‑ready.

Recruiters and HR pros can access a wide library of federal and state forms that update as regulations change. This means your team spends less time searching for the right paperwork and more time helping new hires feel welcome. WorkBright also includes guided error correction that fixes issues before forms are submitted and fraud detection that flags suspicious documents early.

BambooHR

BambooHR platform homepage offering comprehensive HR tools
BambooHR provides an all-in-one solution for HR management

BambooHR brings onboarding into an all‑in‑one HR experience that includes recruiting, employee records, and administration. It’s especially popular with small and mid‑sized teams because it keeps applicant tracking and onboarding under a single platform you can learn quickly. 

The interface is clean and easy to navigate, so HR teams and new hires feel confident moving through each step.

How AI-Powered HR Hiring Tools are Changing Recruitment

According to a BCG survey of chief human resources officers in 2024:

  • If a company is experimenting with AI or GenAI, 70% of them are doing so within HR.
  • Within HR, the top use case for AI or GenAI is talent acquisition.

Most organizations already see the impact. For example, nearly 92% say they are getting real benefits from using AI in HR, and more than 10% report productivity improvements of 30% or more. It reflects real hours saved and real pressure lifted off teams that used to spend days sorting resumes and coordinating interviews. 

Julie Bedard, a managing director and partner at BCG who specializes in talent strategies, points out that AI frees recruiters to spend more time building relationships and expanding talent pools. She also emphasizes the risk of a negative candidate experience if companies neglect the human side of hiring.

This balance between efficiency and experience sets the stage for how AI is reshaping the actual steps in recruitment. 

Automating candidate screening

AI can quickly scan resumes and applications, highlighting the most relevant candidates. It identifies patterns and skills that match the job, helping recruiters focus on applicants with the strongest potential. 

If you’re wondering if it replaces human judgment, it doesn’t. Instead, it removes the burden of manual filtering and gives hiring teams a head start. As a result, recruiters can spend more time connecting with people rather than sorting documents.

AI for interviewing

Similarly, AI-driven platforms can schedule interviews, suggest questions tailored to candidates, and even analyze responses for consistency and key skills. This creates an improved experience for candidates and a clearer picture for recruiters. 

The technology helps uncover strengths and potential that may not appear on paper, while letting recruiters focus on meaningful conversations rather than logistics.

Predictive analytics for better hiring decisions

At a LinkedIn Talent Connect session late last year, one of the speakers said this about talent data and AI: 

“Real‑time signals can help you spot the next big skill before it’s trending on TikTok and build a shortlist faster than you can say Boolean search.” 

That comment came from professionals who work with LinkedIn’s own talent insights, and it reflects what recruiters are starting to see in their day‑to‑day work.

The idea here is simple but meaningful. Predictive analytics finds patterns in a constantly updating stream of talent data, helping hiring teams identify people with emerging skills and actual potential. Those insights give recruiters something concrete to work with early in the process, rather than sending dozens of generic messages.

How to Choose the Right HR Hiring Tool for Your Team

Picking a tool works best when it feels intentional rather than random. Start by asking a few questions to guide your decision.

Key considerations when selecting HR hiring tools

These aspects can help you focus on the features and qualities that really make a difference for your team.

  • Scalability: Look for a tool that grows with your company. If you are hiring hundreds of people each month, you need technology that keeps up without slowing your team down.
  • Customization: Different departments have different needs. A tool that adapts to each workflow makes it easier to manage multiple roles and teams at once.
  • Integration with existing HR tools: Your hiring platform should integrate with your HR systems, including payroll, calendar, and communication tools. Tools that work together reduce repetitive tasks and help your team stay organized.
  • Ease of use: Complex tools create friction. Recruiters adopt tools faster when they are intuitive and enjoyable to use.

Evaluate based on features and budget

Once you have a sense of your team’s needs, shortlist a few tools and test them with real recruiting scenarios. Look at speed, candidate experience, outcomes, and cost. 

When features align with your team’s goals, the platform becomes a long-term asset.

The Hiring Advantage Your Team Needs

Great hiring is not an accident. It happens when you equip your team with the right HR manager tools for hiring that address every stage of the candidate journey. These tools help you reach more candidates, assess them fairly, interview with insight, and onboard new hires smoothly.

For teams looking to combine efficiency, fairness, and meaningful hiring insights, HackerEarth sets itself apart. Here’s why it works so well:

  • Comprehensive assessment library: 40,000+ coding questions across 1,000+ technical skills and 40+ programming languages
  • Structured interviewing with FaceCode: Real-time collaboration, interviewer notes, auto-generated summaries, and masked candidate info for fair evaluations
  • AI-powered evaluation: Instant scoring, detailed skill-wise analytics, and proctoring features to prevent cheating
  • Seamless integration: Works with Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, SAP, and other ATS platforms
  • Scalable at enterprise level: Supports 100,000+ concurrent assessments with 24/7 support
  • Engaging candidate experience: Hackathons, challenges, and interactive assessments to attract and evaluate talent effectively

Take the next step and see how HackerEarth can transform your hiring process. Book a demo today!

FAQs

What are HR hiring tools, and why are they essential for recruitment?

HR hiring tools are software systems that help recruiters attract, evaluate, and hire talent. They speed up workflows, improve candidate experience, and reduce manual work, so teams can focus on meaningful interactions that lead to better hiring decisions.

How do AI‑powered HR hiring tools improve the recruitment process?

AI‑powered hiring tools remove repetitive screening tasks and quickly highlight qualified candidates. These tools give recruiters fair insights into skills and fit across large candidate pools, which shortens time to hire and improves hiring outcomes compared with traditional manual approaches.

What features should I look for in HR hiring tools?

Look for features that support sourcing, screening, interviewing, evaluation, and analytics. Additionally, prioritize tools that integrate with your existing systems, scale with demand, and provide clear dashboards for hiring progress and outcomes.

Can HR hiring tools integrate with my existing ATS?

Yes, many modern solutions, including HackerEarth, support integration with existing applicant tracking systems (ATS), such as Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, and SAP. When your sourcing, screening, and onboarding tools integrate with your ATS, data flows smoothly, and teams avoid duplicate work across systems.

How do I choose the best HR hiring tools for my company?

Start by evaluating the specific challenges your recruitment team faces. Identify the areas where your current process slows down or creates errors. Next, match those needs to the strengths of potential HR hiring tools. Test a few shortlisted options using real hiring scenarios to see how they perform in practice. Consider your budget, how easy the tool is to use, and whether it integrates with your existing HR systems. Finally, choose the tool that improves both hiring speed and the overall candidate experience.

HackerEarth vs TestGorilla: Which Assessment Platform Fits Your Hiring Needs?

Imagine you need to hire five developers and three business analysts in the next 30 days. You want tools that reveal true skills beyond what resumes show. 

Traditional interviews and resumes alone rarely expose real ability. Hence, companies use assessment platforms to filter and select top talent at scale. These tools help hiring teams reduce bias, speed up screening, and find the best candidates faster than ever before. HackerEarth and TestGorilla are two of the most popular online assessment platforms at the forefront of this shift. 

But which platform best fits your hiring needs? This deep comparison breaks down both so you can choose with confidence.

What are Assessment Platforms and Why They Matter

Assessment platforms are tools that help recruiters evaluate candidate skills and potential before making hiring decisions. They assess technical skills, cognitive ability, personality traits, and job‑specific capabilities. 

These insights let hiring teams understand how a candidate performs on tasks similar to real job challenges. 

Here are the main types of assessment platforms you’ll run into:

Tech assessment platforms

These tools focus on evaluating technical skills like programming, systems design, and engineering logic. They use real tasks and challenges to see how well a candidate performs in true‑to‑role scenarios.

Online assessment platforms

Online hiring assessment platforms provide a broad set of tests that companies can run remotely. Recruiters send candidates links and get scored results back quickly. They often cover multiple skill areas and integrate with other HR systems.

Code/Coding assessment platforms

Coding assessment platforms are a subset of tech tools built specifically for developers and engineers. They use problem sets, live coding environments, and benchmarking to test programming ability.

Virtual assessment platforms

These platforms move live evaluation into digital spaces. They might use video responses, AI analysis, or virtual interviews alongside traditional tests. They help hiring teams assess skills and fit without in‑person meetings.

📌Suggested read: Top Technical Skills Assessment Test Tools in 2026

Overview: HackerEarth vs TestGorilla

The use of virtual assessment platforms is growing rapidly. In fact, the global market for talent assessment platforms reached roughly $30 billion in 2026 and is projected to nearly double to $65.29 billion by the mid-2030s. More than 78% of large enterprises now include assessments in hiring and internal development processes. AI-driven scoring and analytics are becoming more common, helping teams review candidate performance quickly and consistently.

With this growth, many companies are turning to platforms that can combine assessments with practical recruiting tools. Let’s take a closer look at two of the most talked-about platforms: HackerEarth and TestGorilla.

What is HackerEarth?

Image Source

As one of the best TestGorilla alternatives, HackerEarth offers a mix of coding tests and interview tools. It combines coding assessments with virtual interviews through FaceCode, reporting dashboards, and structured analytics. The platform guides candidates from the first test to live interviews and final reviews. It also prioritizes simplicity for both recruiters and applicants.

Some of the main features include:

  • FaceCode interviews: Browser-based coding challenges with live audio and video interaction
  • ATS integration: Connects with applicant tracking systems (ATS) to help recruiters follow candidates easily
  • Analytics dashboards: Show structured insights on test results and interview outcomes
  • Customization: Create tailored assessments with over 40+ programming languages supported

The platform works well for small and mid-sized teams that want clear, organized pipelines from test invitations to completed interviews.

What is TestGorilla?

Image Source

TestGorilla is a pre-employment assessment platform that evaluates candidates using skill-based tests rather than relying on resumes alone. It helps companies reduce bias, improve candidate quality, and speed up the hiring process. The platform covers technical, cognitive, and soft skills.

Some of its key features include:

  • Broad test library: More than 350 assessments, including coding, numerical and verbal reasoning, leadership, and personality tests
  • Customization: Employers can add video responses, essays, and file upload questions
  • Anti-cheating measures: Tracks full-screen activity and takes webcam snapshots during tests
  • Evaluation metrics: Automatically ranks candidates based on their performance

It suits teams that want a wide range of assessment options and structured scoring for faster, fairer hiring decisions.

Deep Dive: HackerEarth Features for Technical Assessments

To help you decide which platform fits your hiring needs, we will explore HackerEarth’s key features in detail.

1. Live coding with FaceCode

HackerEarth offers Interview FaceCode, a live coding tool that allows recruiters to conduct real-time coding interviews. It provides a collaborative code editor where candidates can code while interviewers watch and interact. FaceCode includes HD video chat, a diagram board for system design, and a built-in question library. Teams can run live coding interviews with panels of up to 5 interviewers, which allows technical skills to be assessed thoroughly in a single session.

FaceCode also provides AI-powered interview summaries. After each session, the platform generates detailed reports covering technical performance and behavioral insights, including communication, problem-solving approach, and collaboration style. Interview recordings and transcripts are stored indefinitely, so teams can revisit them at any point in the hiring process. Recruiters can also hide candidate information to maintain unbiased evaluation.

Scheduling interviews is simple. All recruiters need to do is invite candidates with branded messages, creating a smooth and professional experience from the very beginning.

2. Rich tech assessment library

HackerEarth’s coding assessments feature a library of over 40,000 questions across more than 1,000 skills, including emerging AI skills. Recruiters can quickly create role-specific tests or upload a job description to automatically generate assessments. The platform supports project-type questions that simulate real on-the-job challenges. Leaderboards help identify top candidates instantly, and automated evaluation ensures objective results.

The platform also includes advanced proctoring with SmartBrowser technology. This prevents impersonation, tab switching, copy-pasting, and other forms of cheating. Recruiters can adjust proctoring levels depending on the assessment’s needs.

Additionally, developers can code in over 40 programming languages, use Jupyter Notebook integration, and access a real-time code editor. 

3. AI-assisted evaluation

On HackerEarth, AI assessments support test creation, automated evaluation, and the recommendation of role-specific questions. It also monitors assessments for bias, offensive language, or irregularities. AI generates insights on candidate performance and skill recommendations, helping hiring teams quickly identify top talent for roles such as AI engineers, ML engineers, or data scientists.

The platform also includes AI-driven scoring, automated evaluation for subjective questions, and deep reporting tools. This allows teams to make data-informed decisions without manual scoring.

4. Seamless workflow for hiring teams

The platform also integrates with popular ATS, including Greenhouse, LinkedIn Talent Hub, Lever, iCIMS, Workable, JazzHR, SmartRecruiters, Zoho Recruit, and Recruiterbox. These integrations allow recruiters to create assessments, invite candidates, and view results without leaving their existing tools.

For custom workflows, HackerEarth offers a Recruit API. Teams can manage assessments, invites, and results from internal systems. Webhook-style event flows let coding tests and live interviews become part of a company’s broader HRIS workflow.

Deep Dive: TestGorilla Capabilities

Now that we are familiar with HackerEarth’s features, let’s walk through what TestGorilla offers and how it supports hiring teams. TestGorilla provides a comprehensive code assessment platform that gives hiring teams a way to see candidates demonstrate their skills early in the process. 

Broad skill coverage

TestGorilla’s library of assessments includes more than 350 validated tests that cover cognitive skills, technical ability, language proficiency, personality traits, and cultural fit. These tests help evaluate candidates from multiple angles so hiring teams get a complete picture of each person’s strengths. The range includes problem-solving and numerical reasoning alongside job‑specific skills for roles in accounting, marketing, sales, customer support, and more. 

The platform also offers tests for technical and programming skills, including new assessments that target software fluency and the skills needed in an AI‑augmented workplace. Personality and culture tests help teams understand how a candidate might align with the company's values. Meanwhile, language tests check grammar, vocabulary, and comprehension in professional settings.

Custom test builder

TestGorilla lets hiring teams create custom assessments that match the exact needs of their roles. Recruiters can start with a job description and then choose tests from the library that match the skills they care about most. They can add custom questions in many formats, including video responses, essays, multiple choice, file uploads, and coding. 

The platform’s AI can also suggest relevant tests and questions based on the role’s requirements, so teams spend less time building assessments and more time reviewing results.

Easy to use for non‑tech roles

TestGorilla’s assessments are built for all kinds of roles, not just technical jobs. Teams hiring for operations, customer service, sales, or creative roles can pick tests that measure the specific skills needed for success. 

The system is browser‑based, so candidates can take assessments on any device without installing software. Clear instructions guide candidates through each part of the assessment, so even non‑tech applicants feel comfortable completing tests.

Candidate experience

TestGorilla focuses on making the experience straightforward for candidates. Each person receives a direct link to their assessment and sees clear directions for every test and question. The interface is simple, and candidates can focus on showing what they know without friction. 

After tests are completed, teams can see the scored results presented side‑by‑side with percentile rankings and insights to quickly compare candidates. This gives candidates a fair chance to show their abilities in a way that goes beyond a resume. 

A Side-by-Side Feature Comparison

This section compares HackerEarth and TestGorilla across key capabilities to show how each platform performs in real hiring workflows.

Technical assessments

A candidate’s real skills often show up only when they’re solving actual problems. Coding tests, simulations, and skill-based assessments reveal how people think, problem-solve, and handle real-world tasks.

Here’s how HackerEarth and TestGorilla put candidates’ abilities to the test:

HackerEarth

HackerEarth provides a dedicated coding assessment platform that focuses on technical evaluation and developer screening. The platform lets recruiters build coding tests from a large library of more than 40,000 questions covering over 1,000 skills. This broad library includes core programming concepts and emerging tech topics, and you can design tests that match specific job needs. HackerEarth also lets you upload a job description and generate coding tests in minutes. 

Assessments produce an automated leaderboard after every test for recruiters to see top performers right away. You can create project‑style questions that feel like real work tasks and listen to detailed reports that show how each candidate approached problems and wrote code. The system supports coding in over 40 languages and integrates with tools such as Jupyter Notebooks, so candidates can work in familiar environments. 

Additionally, proctoring features monitor test conditions and prevent common forms of cheating while HackerEarth records candidate sessions for later review. All of this gives hiring teams a structured way to see real coding ability in action.

TestGorilla

TestGorilla offers a wide range of skill tests that cover technical, cognitive, communication, language, and job‑specific abilities. Teams can pick from more than 350 scientifically validated tests and mix them to match the skills needed for a role. TestGorilla includes technical and programming assessments, as well as other test types that measure workplace skills and thinking. 

The platform lets recruiters add custom questions to assess problem-solving, critical thinking, and role‑based tasks, with formats such as video responses and written answers. AI‑guided setup uses your job description to recommend tests so you get relevant evaluations quickly. 

After candidates complete assessments, TestGorilla provides side‑by‑side results and percentile rankings for each skill, helping teams compare performance across multiple dimensions. This approach gives a structured view of candidate strengths without focusing only on coding.

🏆Winner: HackerEarth

HackerEarth is better suited for deep technical and coding evaluations, and its coding library and session replay give teams a richer view of developer skills. TestGorilla offers a broader set of skills, but HackerEarth offers greater depth for technical assessments.

Platform capabilities

A strong assessment platform gives teams the tools to manage assessments, track performance, and make hiring decisions faster.

Let’s see how HackerEarth and TestGorilla equip recruiters with these capabilities:

HackerEarth

HackerEarth is built around technical assessment and developer hiring. It gives recruiters tools to run coding tests, generate automated leaderboards, replay candidate coding sessions, and drill into question‑level performance. 

The platform integrates testing with interview workflows, so live-coding interviews can sit alongside on-demand problems. Recruiters can tailor difficulty levels for different roles and review detailed insight into candidates' work styles. HackerEarth also supports integrations with applicant tracking systems so assessment results appear inside existing recruiting workflows.

TestGorilla

TestGorilla helps teams assess a broader range of skills beyond technical tests. Its platform includes cognitive ability tests, communication and language tests, personality and culture-fit assessments, and role‑specific skill tests for roles ranging from marketing to customer support. 

It also offers automated scoring for video interview responses, AI resume scoring that ranks applicants against job descriptions, and qualifying screening questions that filter candidates early. Analytics give teams a view of candidate progress through each stage of assessment, and recruiters can compare candidates across multiple tests in a single dashboard.

🏆Winner: TestGorilla

TestGorilla’s broader set of assessment options makes it more flexible for general hiring needs, while HackerEarth is most powerful for developers.

Use case fit

Different roles demand different skills, and no single platform fits every hiring scenario. Some excel at developer hiring, others at evaluating broader talent.

We’ll compare how HackerEarth and TestGorilla match specific job types and hiring needs:

HackerEarth

HackerEarth is ideal for teams hiring developers or for technical roles where deep coding skills matter. The platform tests critical programming abilities and simulates real engineering challenges. 

Recruiters can see how candidates solve real problems and how their coding style unfolds in a shared environment. Developers and technical hiring teams like this because it feels closer to real work.

TestGorilla

TestGorilla works well for roles that need a mix of skills. Teams looking for talent in sales, marketing, operations, customer service, or hybrid jobs get assessments that cover critical thinking, communication, and role‑specific abilities. 

Because the tests include personality and language skills too, TestGorilla gives teams a way to assess candidate fit across many job types with context‑rich scoring. This makes it a strong choice for general hiring needs.

🏆Winner: Tie

For technical roles, the edge goes to HackerEarth, and for broader talent evaluation, the edge goes to TestGorilla.

How to Choose the Right Assessment Platform

Vendor demos often show perfect scenarios, but hiring in the real world is rarely so neat. Asking the right questions helps uncover what the tool actually measures and how it performs when candidates are doing real work.

On AI and scoring methodology

How a platform scores candidates can change how you interpret the results. Some use transcript-based analysis, which focuses on reasoning and knowledge while avoiding bias from appearance or voice. Others use multimodal scoring, which captures more signals but adds complexity. 

You also want to know if the AI provides explanations that you can review. Without context, scores are just numbers. HackerEarth’s AI complements code assessments by highlighting problem-solving steps and coding patterns. Similarly, TestGorilla uses AI to analyze multi-skill assessments and video interviews, helping teams quickly compare cognitive, personality, and job-specific traits. 

On candidate experience

A positive candidate experience flows naturally from an assessment design that aligns with the role’s demands, helping you measure skills accurately without causing unnecessary frustration. HackerEarth suits developers who are comfortable with live coding and detailed programming tests, as the tools allow them to demonstrate their reasoning in real time. 

TestGorilla fits roles where broad skills matter, offering video responses, cognitive assessments, and shorter tests that candidates can complete easily on mobile. 

On integration

Integration determines how smoothly assessment results flow into your workflow. If results land as structured fields in your ATS, your team can act on them without switching platforms or re-entering data. Automated triggers for sending assessments save time and reduce human error. 

HackerEarth works well for engineering teams that need tightly integrated coding assessments and live interview data inside the ATS. TestGorilla fits organizations that hire across many functions and need flexible integration to track a variety of skills. The platform you choose should align with how your team works, so that assessments enhance rather than slow down your process.

Found Your Perfect TestGorilla Alternative?

If you are considering a strong alternative to TestGorilla for technical assessments, HackerEarth is worth a closer look. 

Here’s a quick rundown of what makes HackerEarth the best fit:

  • Deep technical assessment: HackerEarth specializes in tech assessment and coding assessment platforms, offering live coding, algorithm challenges, and AI‑assisted evaluation for developers. 
  • Rich question library: With over 40,000+ pre‑built tech assessment questions, it covers multiple programming languages and frameworks, making it ideal for high‑volume developer hiring.
  • Seamless workflow: HackerEarth integrates with hiring systems to streamline candidate tracking and scoring and supports virtual assessment platforms for remote teams.
  • Candidate experience: Interactive coding sessions and clear scoring improve engagement while keeping the evaluation fair and transparent.

Final Verdict: Find the Assessment Platform That Fits Your Team

Ultimately, the choice between HackerEarth and TestGorilla comes down to focus.

HackerEarth offers a strong tech assessment experience and unmatched depth for developer hiring. TestGorilla, in contrast, offers broader skills testing that helps teams screen candidates for diverse roles. Each platform has clear strengths, and your unique needs should guide your choice.

Ready to transform your hiring? Try HackerEarth today and discover how live coding and AI‑assisted evaluation can help you identify top talent faster than ever.

FAQs

What is the best alternative to TestGorilla for technical assessments?

HackerEarth is often considered a strong alternative for technical assessments because it offers extensive coding evaluation tools, live coding interviews, and an expansive question library for developer roles.

How do tech assessment platforms differ from traditional testing?

Code assessment platforms focus on real skills like coding, problem solving, and role‑relevant tasks, whereas traditional testing often relies on resumes and interviews that may not reveal actual ability.

Does TestGorilla offer live coding interviews?

TestGorilla supports video interview questions and recorded responses, but it does not provide an interactive live coding environment like some other platforms.

Can HackerEarth replace TestGorilla for coding challenge tests?

Yes, HackerEarth can replace TestGorilla for coding challenge tests and live technical interviews because it has a deep focus on developer screening and coding workflows.

What should I consider in TestGorilla pricing before choosing a platform?

Look at your hiring volume, the mix of technical and non‑technical roles, and credit or subscription costs to find the most cost‑effective plan for your needs.

HackerEarth vs Codility: A Side-by-Side Comparison for Tech Recruiters

It is easy to feel overwhelmed by how fast tech hiring is changing. New AI recruitment tools promise to screen candidates faster, smarter, and with less bias. It almost sounds like recruiters might be replaced.

But humans and technology make a great team, especially in hiring.

Codility is often the first choice for many teams. It is familiar, reliable, and widely used. But as hiring needs grow, recruiters start exploring Codility alternatives that offer more flexibility and better candidate experiences. At the same time, AI recruitment tools are changing how hiring works, helping teams move faster while making smarter decisions.

HackerEarth and Codility are two platforms that often come up in this conversation. This comparison will help you understand how they differ and which one best fits your hiring needs.

Overview of HackerEarth and Codility

Is there a way to see what a developer can actually do without sitting through endless interviews?

Resumes and phone screens can only tell so much, and even coding exercises on their own can miss how someone thinks and solves problems in real time. Luckily, the best developer assessment tools have made this process much easier. They give recruiters a way to see candidates’ actual skills without spending hours evaluating them. 

HackerEarth and Codility help recruiters do exactly that. Both combine coding assessments, interview tools, and analytics to give a clear picture of a candidate’s capabilities.

What is HackerEarth?

Image Source

HackerEarth is an all-in-one AI tool for recruitment that combines coding tests with virtual interviews. It guides candidates from their first test to live interviews and final reviews, keeping the process simple for both recruiters and applicants.

Some of its main features include:

  • Assessments: Pre-built or customizable coding tests with high reliability for large-scale hiring
  • AI Proctoring: Smart Browser, webcam monitoring, audio tracking, and screen locking to maintain integrity
  • FaceCode: Live video interviews with a built-in IDE for collaborative coding and system design tasks
  • Question Library: Over 40,000+ questions covering multiple programming languages, full stack, SQL, and AI-driven tasks
  • Analytics & Reports: Deep insights into candidate performance, plagiarism checks, and benchmarking

HackerEarth works well for small and mid-sized teams looking for a clear, organized recruitment pipeline.

What is Codility?

Image Source

Codility helps companies build and grow AI-enabled teams through skills-based technical assessments. It gives recruiters a structured way to evaluate candidates’ engineering skills, map team capabilities, and spot skill gaps.

Its features focus on practical, real-world evaluation:

  • Screen: Asynchronous, role-specific coding assessments to qualify top candidates efficiently
  • Interview: Structured technical interviews to see how candidates perform in real-time
  • Skill Mapping: Tools to identify skill gaps within teams and support targeted development or AI upskilling

Codility also brings AI tools for recruitment into the process, helping teams measure skills reliably and make faster hiring decisions. It combines assessment science with practical workflows to give data-driven insights without slowing down the hiring process.

Feature Comparison: HackerEarth vs Codility

Before we dive deeper, here’s a side-by-side comparison between HackerEarth and Codility across the features that actually shape your hiring process:

Category HackerEarth Codility
Question Library 40,000+ questions, including Selenium 850+ tasks with limited Selenium coverage
Skills Supported 1,000+ skills 90+ skills
Programming Languages 40+ languages 30+ languages
Test Creation Skill-based, role-based, job description upload, manual Skill-based, role-based, job description upload, manual
Question Types MCQ, programming, full stack, data science, ML, SQL, DevOps, Selenium, subjective, diagram, front end, essay MCQ, programming, full stack, data science, ML, SQL, DevOps, Selenium limited, subjective, diagram, front end, essay
Proctoring Capabilities Smart Browser, AI snapshots, surprise questions, audio proctoring, tab tracking, copy-paste control, IP restriction, photo ID verification Video proctoring, tab tracking, copy-paste control, IP restriction, photo ID verification
AI Detection Layer Detects external AI tools, dual screens, screen sharing patterns Limited detection signals
Auto Evaluation for Subjective Answers Yes, AI compares responses with benchmark answers Not available
Jupyter Notebook for Data Science Fully integrated Not available, only R simulator
Question Insights Available Not available
Code Quality Analysis Available Not available
Leaked Question Indicator Yes Yes
Pooling Yes Yes
Candidate Limit No restriction No restriction
Enterprise Dashboard Yes Yes
Code Player (Replay) Yes Yes
Proctored Interviews Yes Not available
Automated Interview Summary Yes Not available
Import Candidate Submissions Yes Not available
Whiteboard Sessions Not available Available
Diagram Board Available Available

Key Benefits of HackerEarth and Codility for Tech Recruiters

To help you decide which platform best fits your hiring needs, we will explore the key features of both Codility and HackerEarth in detail.

Benefits of HackerEarth for tech recruiters

HackerEarth is built for teams that need a complete view of a candidate’s technical abilities without adding friction to the hiring process. It combines coding assessments, live interviews, proctoring, and analytics for technical screening into one platform, giving recruiters clear, actionable insights at every stage.

Here’s how:

Real-time, AI-assisted coding interviews

FaceCode is HackerEarth’s live coding interview tool. It allows recruiters to set up interviews, invite candidates, and collaborate on a real-time code editor. Each session automatically generates detailed reports that include technical performance as well as communication, problem-solving approach, and teamwork skills.

Recruiters can conduct panel interviews with up to 5 interviewers at once. FaceCode supports more than 40+ programming languages, making it easy to evaluate candidates regardless of their technical background. 

At the same time, features like diagram boards let candidates walk you through system design thinking, which adds another layer to the evaluation. Then when the interview wraps up, recordings and transcripts stay accessible, so even if you revisit a profile days later, the full context is still right there waiting for you.

Customizable coding tests

HackerEarth’s recruitment assessment tool allows recruiters to design coding tests that match specific job roles. Recruiters can choose from a library of over 40,000 pre-built questions, covering programming languages, full-stack development, SQL, and AI-driven tasks. 

As candidates start taking these tests, leaderboards automatically rank performance, so strong profiles start standing out almost immediately. This naturally leads to faster shortlisting, since you are no longer manually going through every submission.

What makes this even more useful is how closely these tests can mirror real work. Project-based questions let you see how someone approaches actual problems, not just textbook scenarios. Additionally, advanced proctoring ensures fair assessments, monitoring candidate activity to prevent impersonation, tab switching, or copy-pasting. 

As results come in, detailed reports and code replays help you understand what the candidate wrote and even how they got there. 

Seamless integrations

Once assessments and interviews start moving, the last thing you want is to keep switching between tools just to track progress. HackerEarth integrates with your existing workflow, so everything stays connected.

It integrates with major applicant tracking systems (ATS) such as Lever, Workable, JazzHR, Keka, and LinkedIn Talent Hub. This allows recruiters to send assessments, track candidate progress, and view performance reports directly within the ATS. The platform also provides robust APIs for custom integrations, enabling secure data transfer and flexible workflows.

Benefits of Codility for tech recruiters

If your hiring process needs consistency across roles, teams, or even regions, Codility leans heavily into structured evaluation.

Here are some of the features it provides:

Standardized assessments

Codility’s skills-based framework gives you a consistent way to evaluate candidates, which makes comparisons feel fair instead of subjective. As candidates move through screening and interviews, the platform keeps the same structure intact to connect every decision back to measurable skills.

This approach also extends beyond hiring. You can map skills across your existing teams, identify gaps, and plan training with the same data you used during recruitment.

Automated grading

The platform’s automated grading system evaluates candidate code for correctness, efficiency, and performance using hidden test cases. It instantly generates detailed reports with scores, time complexity analysis, and plagiarism detection. This eliminates the need for manual grading, allowing recruiters to assess large volumes of candidates without losing accuracy.

The platform also includes AI-assisted assessments that evaluate skills related to generative AI and modern engineering practices. This makes it easier to hire developers who can work with emerging technologies and build AI-ready teams.

Scalable solutions

With Codility, recruiters can test thousands of candidates at once and run remote interviews without compromising assessment quality. The platform supports performance-based evaluations that measure how well code handles large datasets and real-world conditions.

It includes enterprise-ready features such as ATS integrations, anti-plagiarism checks, and the AI assistant Cody, which helps recruiters assess how candidates collaborate with AI tools. These capabilities make Codility a strong solution for organizations that need to hire efficiently while preparing teams for future technology demands.

📌Suggested read: FaceCode vs. Traditional Coding Interviews: Why Live Code Testing Wins

Codility Alternatives: How HackerEarth Stands Out

Recruiters looking beyond Codility often find that HackerEarth offers more flexibility, smarter assessments, and a better candidate experience.

How does HackerEarth compare to Codility’s alternatives?

Here’s how HackerEarth compares to Codility's assessment features:

1. Proctoring that actually covers the full environment

Most platforms talk about proctoring, but HackerEarth goes deeper into how candidates behave during a test. It combines Smart Browser, AI snapshots, and surprise questions to keep a constant check on the environment without interrupting the flow.

This setup helps flag things like external AI tool usage, dual screens, or screen sharing as they happen. Codility offers proctoring, too, but it relies more on standard snapshots and video monitoring, which may miss certain unusual testing scenarios.

2. A much deeper question library

The difference in scale becomes obvious the moment you start building tests. HackerEarth gives you access to over 40,000 questions, including a strong set for niche areas like Selenium.

Codility, in comparison, offers around 850 tasks, which can start to feel limiting when you are hiring across multiple roles or seniority levels. This naturally affects how varied and role-specific your assessments can get over time.

3. AI evaluation for subjective answers

HackerEarth’s AI model evaluates long-form answers by comparing them against benchmark responses that you define. This means you can assess thought process, clarity, and depth without manually reviewing every response.

Codility does not support automated evaluation for subjective answers, which adds more manual effort as your hiring volume grows.

4. Better experience for data science roles

For data-heavy roles, the interface itself can shape how candidates perform. HackerEarth integrates Jupyter Notebook directly into the assessment environment, so candidates can work the way they normally would.

This makes the experience feel natural and reduces friction during the test. Codility offers an R-based simulator that works for specific use cases but lacks the flexibility needed for modern data science workflows.

📌Also read: Top 6 Online Technical Interview Platforms to Use in 2026

How to Choose the Right Technical Assessment Platform for Your Organisation

If you pick a recruitment AI tool only by ticking boxes on a feature list, you might miss how well it fits into your team’s workflow and hiring experience.

The right choice becomes clearer when you look at these practical areas:

Customization needs

Every role asks for something slightly different, and your assessment platform should reflect that without slowing you down. When you create automated assessments, you should be able to build them around real job requirements instead of adjusting roles to fit pre-built tests.

HackerEarth lets you pull from a large question library, tweak difficulty levels, and even add project-based tasks that mirror actual work. This makes your hiring process feel more aligned with the role, which naturally leads to better candidate evaluation.

Live vs. asynchronous assessments

Hiring rarely happens in one format, and your platform should support both without friction. At times, you want asynchronous tests to quickly screen a large pool, and at other times, you need live interviews to understand how a candidate thinks in real time.

HackerEarth bridges this gap through its assessment platform and FaceCode interviews, where candidates can code, explain, and collaborate in the same space. This continuity makes the transition from screening to interviews feel natural. For teams using recruitment tools for HR, this flexibility reduces back and forth and helps keep candidates engaged throughout the process.

Scalability

As your hiring needs grow, the process that once felt simple can become complicated. A good platform grows with you, so it should handle high candidate volumes without compromising evaluation quality.

HackerEarth supports large-scale assessments with automated ranking, detailed reports, and proctoring layers that stay consistent across all candidates. This helps your team focus on decision-making rather than on managing the process itself.

Similarly, built-in technical screening analytics give you a clearer view of your hiring funnel, which helps you refine your approach with every hiring cycle.

Integrations

Finally, the right platform should connect smoothly with your existing systems, especially your ATS. HackerEarth integrates with tools like Lever and Workable, which means you can create automated assessments, send them to candidates, and review results without leaving your core workflow. 

This keeps everything in sync and reduces manual updates across systems.

📌Bonus read: How to Choose the Best Sourcing Tools for Your Recruitment Process

Which Platform Works Better for Your Team: HackerEarth or Codility?

In the end, the choice between HackerEarth and Codility comes down to how much depth and control you want in your hiring process.

HackerEarth brings together everything you need to create automated assessments, run live coding interviews, and evaluate candidates with AI-backed insights. In contrast, Codility offers a structured, consistent approach to technical screening that works well for teams seeking standardized evaluations across roles. Each platform brings value, though the experience they offer feels quite different once you start using them day-to-day.

If you are ready to rethink how you hire, now is a good time to explore what HackerEarth can actually do in a real hiring setup. Book a demo today and see for yourself!

FAQs

How does FaceCode by HackerEarth compare to Codility’s live coding interviews?

FaceCode by HackerEarth creates a more complete interview experience where candidates can code, explain, and collaborate in the same space. It adds AI-generated summaries and interview recordings, which help you revisit decisions later. In comparison, Codility also supports live coding, though it offers fewer insights after the session ends.

What are the benefits of using HackerEarth over Codility for coding assessments?

HackerEarth gives you a rich library of 40,000+ questions, deeper proctoring, and AI-based evaluation that goes beyond basic scoring. This helps you understand how candidates think, not just what they submit. Codility handles structured assessments well, though it offers less flexibility for role-specific or project-based evaluations.

Does Codility support AI-powered candidate matching like HackerEarth?

HackerEarth uses AI to evaluate responses, generate interview summaries, and add more context to each candidate profile. This makes it easier to compare candidates across multiple dimensions. Codility focuses more on structured scoring and performance analysis, and it does not offer the same level of AI-driven candidate evaluation or matching.

How does the pricing of HackerEarth compare to Codility?

HackerEarth offers clear monthly tiers, starting at $99, which makes it easier for smaller teams to get started and scale gradually. Codility follows a higher annual pricing model, starting at $1200 per user, which can feel more rigid for growing teams.

What types of coding assessments does HackerEarth support?

HackerEarth supports a wide range of assessments, including programming challenges, full-stack tasks, data science problems, machine learning, SQL, DevOps, and Selenium testing. It also supports subjective and project-based questions that help you evaluate real-world problem-solving and technical accuracy.

Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo