Home
/
Blog
/
Developer Insights
/
The most popular data structures for coding interviews

The most popular data structures for coding interviews

Author
Connie Benton
Calendar Icon
June 26, 2020
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

As a beginner in programming, you may be able to work on your projects confidently. However, proving your worth in an interview by showcasing impeccable programming skills may be challenging.

Apart from the pressure that you must feel when your employment depends on a 45-minute talk, there’s one more thing that makes beginner programmers uneasy. You can’t look for answers like you’d typically do if you’re at loss when solving a programming problem.

While you can think your way through a difficult code implementation question, when it comes to data structures, the only thing that’s going to save you is knowledge. Here are the 6 most popular data structures that will help you ace your next coding interview.

Arrays

An array is one of the most basic data structures. Heaps, linked lists, and others are formed based on arrays. Hence, knowing everything you can about arrays is crucial to let your employers know you’re good at data management.

Most interviews would start by asking basic questions. You may need to explain how arrays work and how implementing arrays would work in different languages. You may also need to provide a couple of examples of languages with zero and 1-based indexing. Most popular languages today are zero-based, while some like Cobol and Fortran are 1-based.

Now, when you’re done with the basic questions, you’ll have to answer something more advanced. Typically, you’ll need to provide an answer to a practical problem and write some code to execute your solution.

A good example of this would be finding the second largest number in the array or deleting duplicate entries.

Apart from the duplicate entry questions, there’s another one that often appears on data structure interviews. This type of question heavily relies on maths, like finding the longest consecutive sequence of numbers in an array or a subarray with the largest sum. You’ll need to work on your math skills to answer any of these.

Stacks and queues

Both stack and queue are linear data structures, but the major difference between them is that stack uses the Last In, First Out method while queue uses the First In, First Out method. Essentially, a stack is a data structure where new elements are put on top and are normally retrieved from the top of the list, and a queue is a structure where new elements are placed in the bottom and are retrieved from the top as well.

Apart from talking about the implementation of these two data structures in practice, you will have to answer questions about implementing one as the other. That is, the interviewer may ask how you would implement a queue using a stack or vice versa.

Linked list

Linked lists are the basis for implementing queues and stacks, and are quite crucial for creating graphs. In this structure, elements of the array are interlinked instead of being indexed as in an array. This means you do not need to re-declare memory if an array grows too big as it doesn’t have to be close to each other to work.

This data structure is a great solution when you need to delete or insert items into the list constantly, and you aren’t strained in terms of memory usage. Apart from explaining these differences from the arrays, there’s one question that most interviews that bring up linked lists will mention—the loops.

When you insert or delete an element from the list, you need to rearrange pointers, as there may be a loop in there that breaks the code. Hence, finding and eliminating one is one of the most common linked list questions.

You may also have to find solutions to problems like finding and/or deleting certain nodes of the linked list, flattening and sorting lists, and merging sorting lists. Explaining why merge sort is better than quicksort for linked lists may also appear on the list of questions.

Hash table

Hash tables use a hashing algorithm to assign keys to index values, making an array effectively a two-column table where you can’t choose the value of the first column but can map it with a function itself. The easiest way to imagine a hash table is to assign an index number from 0 to 25 to all letters of the alphabet and then analyze how many times each letter appears in a certain word.

But that’s an easy example. Let’s say a hash table has to present data on response times of your VPN servers in Australia in each Australian town. With so many values to go through the hash function, you’re definitely going to have values that yield identical keys. That’s called hash collision, and it’s one of the major questions on interviews that deal with data structures.

There’s more than one way of solving this problem, and you need to know at least a couple of them and how they would differ. Separate chaining, for instance, is easier to implement than open addressing, but open addressing doesn’t take up as much memory in the end.

Apart from that, you will have to answer some basic hash table questions like finding missing elements and solve maths-related problems like finding a pair with a given sum. Also, expect to hear a question or two about the perfect hash function.

Trees

Probably the biggest set of questions you’ll have to answer when it comes to trees is about typology. While a tree data structure is a rather simple structure with a parent node linking to zero or more child nodes, there are so many subtypes that you can spend half an hour just talking about them.

While there are plenty of tree-like structures, you will be mostly talking about binary trees, BSTs, N-ary trees, AVL trees, as well as some other self-balancing trees and Heap structures.

After you’re done explaining the differences between these types of data structures, you’ll be mostly down to questions that deal with either navigating trees or implementing them in real-life situations.

Examples of the first type of questions would be calculating the height of a tree, transforming binary trees to perfect binary trees, or truncating a given tree to remove that lie on a certain path.

Graphs

A graph is a data structure where a set of nodes is connected with edges. As simple as this sounds, graphs are used everywhere, from GPS-based applications to Facebook. As graphs have a multi-faceted use potential, you may encounter a lot of questions about this data structure during an interview.

One of the easiest questions about graphs you can encounter is detecting and dealing with cycles. Another one deals with the minimum number of steps needed to perform a transformation or an operation.

A huge deal of graph questions is going to be about navigating the network of nodes and edges. You’ll need to explain what topological sorting is to your interviewer and find solutions to problems like finding the shortest path from one node to another in a given graph. You may also need to find the longest path in a DAG, clone a DAG, or calculate the maximum number of edges you can add to one for it to remain acyclic.

Some of the harder problems you may encounter during the interview include the traveling salesman problem, the vertex cover problem, or problems related to the Erdos Renyl model or clustering coefficient.

However, these are higher-tier questions and you may not need to ace them to pass an interview as a beginner in programming.

Excel at your next interview

Learning every possible question about data structures for the interview may be frustrating if you’re just cramming the information. If you want to succeed at interviews consistently, you need to practice and improve your data structure skills.

Work on pet projects to not just learn the typology of data structures but understand how they are used and what are the benefits of one or another structure. If that’s not an option for you, find common data science problems that you can solve and practice that way.

However, that’s going to prepare you for working with data. The only way you can prepare yourself for a data structure interview is by going through many interviews. Take part in mock interviews to polish your skills and excel at the next real interview you schedule.

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Connie Benton
Calendar Icon
June 26, 2020
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

The Mobile Dev Hiring Landscape Just Changed

Revolutionizing Mobile Talent Hiring: The HackerEarth Advantage

The demand for mobile applications is exploding, but finding and verifying developers with proven, real-world skills is more difficult than ever. Traditional assessment methods often fall short, failing to replicate the complexities of modern mobile development.

Introducing a New Era in Mobile Assessment

At HackerEarth, we're closing this critical gap with two groundbreaking features, seamlessly integrated into our Full Stack IDE:

Article content

Now, assess mobile developers in their true native environment. Our enhanced Full Stack questions now offer full support for both Java and Kotlin, the core languages powering the Android ecosystem. This allows you to evaluate candidates on authentic, real-world app development skills, moving beyond theoretical knowledge to practical application.

Article content

Say goodbye to setup drama and tool-switching. Candidates can now build, test, and debug Android and React Native applications directly within the browser-based IDE. This seamless, in-browser experience provides a true-to-life evaluation, saving valuable time for both candidates and your hiring team.

Assess the Skills That Truly Matter

With native Android support, your assessments can now delve into a candidate's ability to write clean, efficient, and functional code in the languages professional developers use daily. Kotlin's rapid adoption makes proficiency in it a key indicator of a forward-thinking candidate ready for modern mobile development.

Breakup of Mobile development skills ~95% of mobile app dev happens through Java and Kotlin
This chart illustrates the importance of assessing proficiency in both modern (Kotlin) and established (Java) codebases.

Streamlining Your Assessment Workflow

The integrated mobile emulator fundamentally transforms the assessment process. By eliminating the friction of fragmented toolchains and complex local setups, we enable a faster, more effective evaluation and a superior candidate experience.

Old Fragmented Way vs. The New, Integrated Way
Visualize the stark difference: Our streamlined workflow removes technical hurdles, allowing candidates to focus purely on demonstrating their coding and problem-solving abilities.

Quantifiable Impact on Hiring Success

A seamless and authentic assessment environment isn't just a convenience, it's a powerful catalyst for efficiency and better hiring outcomes. By removing technical barriers, candidates can focus entirely on demonstrating their skills, leading to faster submissions and higher-quality signals for your recruiters and hiring managers.

A Better Experience for Everyone

Our new features are meticulously designed to benefit the entire hiring ecosystem:

For Recruiters & Hiring Managers:

  • Accurately assess real-world development skills.
  • Gain deeper insights into candidate proficiency.
  • Hire with greater confidence and speed.
  • Reduce candidate drop-off from technical friction.

For Candidates:

  • Enjoy a seamless, efficient assessment experience.
  • No need to switch between different tools or manage complex setups.
  • Focus purely on showcasing skills, not environment configurations.
  • Work in a powerful, professional-grade IDE.

Unlock a New Era of Mobile Talent Assessment

Stop guessing and start hiring the best mobile developers with confidence. Explore how HackerEarth can transform your tech recruiting.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing c

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo