Home
/
Blog
/
Hiring Strategies
/
7 Modern Performance Appraisal Methods to Boost Workforce Development

7 Modern Performance Appraisal Methods to Boost Workforce Development

Author
Nischal V Chadaga
Calendar Icon
November 19, 2024
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Introduction

Performance appraisal has seen a tremendous change over the years. It is no longer just a grading of employees once in a year. Rather, it is now viewed as a central source for workforce development, assisting employees in growing and contributing towards organizational goals as contributors themselves. However, in contemporary work, older appraisal methods are pretty limited as they cannot replicate the complexity of modern work.

Modern performance appraisal methods step into the picture at this point. These are characterized by the totality of development of employees and constant feedback, collaboration, as well as the achievement of measurable results. Here, we are discussing seven modern performance appraisal methods that will develop your workforce and ensure that organizations see better outcomes.

Method 1: 360-Degree Feedback

How It Works

A comprehensive method, 360-degree feedback is a method of gathering input from multiple sources. It includes peers, subordinates, supervisors, and even the employees themselves. Such an approach gives a full-circle view of the performance of an individual by capturing feedback at all levels.

For example, a project deadline assigned for a supervisor might be a concern for the peers, thereby throwing more light on teamwork and collaboration. Leadership traits may be accessible from a subordinate’s perspective, while self-assessment can throw light upon what is in the mind of an individual worker.

Benefits

  • This provides a holistic and rounded view of performance.
  • Promotes communication and openness in teams.
  • It promotes employee self-awareness in understanding how others view actions and contributions.
  • Reveals hidden strengths and weaknesses unknown to less effective appraisal methods.

Implementation Tips

  • Anonymous surveys will help extract honest feedback.
  • Train employees and their managers to give constructive and actionable feedback.
  • Feedback given in a way that emphasizes growth and development rather than critique.
  • Integration of 360-degree feedback and single, private discussion for personal or individual action plans.

Method 2: Management by Objectives (MBO)

How It Works

Management by Objectives is an appraisal technique in which the objective of setting the goals of managers and employees to work upon or address acts like a catalyst. Managers and employees jointly define specific, measurable objectives that are aligned with the organization’s overall goal, ensuring that the employees know what is expected of them.

As an example, if a company sought an increase in customer satisfaction, a goal for an employee working on the customer support side might be to achieve a score of at least 90% of positive comments from customer surveys after six months.

Benefits

  • states and measurable performance expectations
  • encourages accountability because he connects individual goals to success at the organizational level
  • pushes employees to have a direction or purpose
  • challenges the significance of results and thus helps to contribute to the greater good

Implementation Tips

  • Define goals in terms of the SMART framework—Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound.
  • Review progress periodically and adjust goals to keep the employees on track with the organizational priorities.
  • Celebrate milestones that raise motivation in them
  • Make use of performance dashboards in giving visualizations on the progress, as well as something to keep track of the achievements
  • For businesses such as invoice factoring companies, aligning individual objective with organizational goals ensures teams remain focused on enhancing operational efficiency and delivering exceptional services to clients

Method 3: Continuous Performance Management

How It Works

Continuous performance management is a modern way of alternative annual appraisals. Instead of waiting until an entire year has elapsed to give the feedback, frequent checks-in are conducted between the manager and employees in this method. Goals, areas of improvement, and performance are the purposes of these discussions that allow real-time adjustments.

This method works highly effectively in a fast-moving work environment created for today’s fast-moving priorities.

Benefits

  • Ideal recognizer of achievements.
  • Encourages learning and development
  • Lines up individual work with organization’s goals
  • Improves employee and management communication

Implementation Tips

  • Have one-on-one, weekly or bi-weekly sessions with the staff to discuss their performance and challenges
  • Utilize the performance management software at your disposal, which will streamline giving feedback and tracking the achievement of objectives more efficiently
  • Keep open communication as a mantra by making a safe haven in which employees feel comfortable sharing their needs.
  • Keep it a development and growth conversation, not an evaluation.
  • Make use of QR codes where employees can scan to tap into training and feedback mechanisms at any point during a session.

Method 4: Balanced Scorecard

How It Works

The balanced scorecard is a strategic performance appraisal approach, which gives an appraisal of the employee based on various dimensions, such as financial performance, customer satisfaction, internal processes, and learning and growth. In this way, long-term contributions are also counted in measuring performance against short-term results.

For example, the performance of a marketing manager would be measured against sales targets achieved (financial), higher levels of customer engagement (customer), effective process automation in marketing (internal), and improvement in the skills of employees (learning and growth).

Benefits

  • It provides an all-around view of performance over various aspects.
  • Keeps the individual activities in harmony with the organizational strategy and objectives.
  • Employees are motivated towards results-both short-term and long-term.
  • Strengths and weaknesses can be easily determined over various dimensions.

Implementation Tips

  • Formulate KPIs for each perspective in the balanced scorecard.
  • Use scorecards or dashboards to make tracking easier.
  • Administer the regular performance reviews and include the appropriate discussion on the balanced scorecard.
  • Train the employees on how effectively the metrics of a balanced scorecard may be used and interpreted.

Method 5: Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)

How it Works

BARS is an appraisal in which specific, well-defined behaviors serve as marks or benchmarks for determining people’s performance. BARS does not use fuzzy criteria like others do, such as good communication skills; instead, it gives concrete examples of what exactly good communication is.

On customer service, a BARS or a behaviorally anchored scale may describe “smiling at customers,” “issues resolved promptly,” and “complaints followed up within 48 hours.”

Benefits

  • Saves performance ratings from being subjective and having variations.
  • Clearly communicates expectations to employees.
  • Eliminates Ambiguity and Bias of the Appraisal Process. Assists managers in providing behavior-specific feedback based on observed conduct.

Implementation Tips

  • Jointly define with employees which behaviors represent their jobs
  • Train managers in use of BARS consistently for all team members.
  • Review and update periodically the standards of behavior to reflect changes in job expectations
  • Include BARS with qualitative performance feedback for comprehensive evaluation

Method 6: Self-Assessment

How It Works

Self-appraisal aims to involve the employees in judging their performance, achievements, as well as areas of challenge. It is never a way of allowing the employee to grade themselves but increases the chances of them realizing what they contributed and where they can improve.

This approach empowers the employees by the appraisals process and deepens the understanding of the manager about the employees.

Benefits

  • This lets the employees self-reflect as well as be accountable.
  • Employees are encouraged to take responsibility for the development.
  • Gives managers sharp insights as to how employees feel about their jobs and contributions
  • Helps managers in identifying gaps between what employees perceive at the end of an appraisal and how employees have performed in reality

Implementation Tips

  • Develop standardized self-reporting forms that ask open-ended questions
  • Ask the employees to mark their accomplishments, challenges, and areas for improvement
  • Self-reporting forms become the launching pads for the discussions with managers
  • Combine self-reporting forms with other appraisal methods for better accuracy

Method 7: Peer Review

How It Works

Peer review allows colleagues to appraise each other’s performance. This would perform pretty well if there is teamwork, and everyone is supposed to achieve the objectives set. Through soliciting peer reviews, the organizations will achieve one way of gaining insight on how the employees contribute to achieving team success.

For example, evaluating the project team’s performance, peers’ appraisal of a staff based on communication, reliability, and teamwork can be deemed applicable.

Benefits

  • Enhances teamwork and develops more supportive relationships within teams.
  • It provides multifaceted viewpoints of how a particular employee performs.
  • Helps to recognize areas where the managers cannot easily see.
  • Fosters mutual respect and accountability

Implementation Tips

  • Establish clear guidelines for fairness and minimum bias.
  • Focus on giving positive remarks that help them grow and improve.
  • Varying reviewer rotation with a mixture of people providing a balance in the review.
  • Employees should be trained on how to give and take peer feedback

Conclusion

Modern methods of performance appraisal are more than mere evaluation tools; they are increasingly a tool of workforce development strategies for organizations. They help establish continuous improvement, collaboration, and engagement.

No matter what the method is – 360-degree feedback, MBO, continuous performance management, balanced scorecards, BARS, self-assessment, or peer reviews, for that matter, each method has a flavor of its own advantage. At some point in the application, multiple approaches may be able to come together as an overall system of appraisals to satisfy the diverse needs of the members of the workforce.

The objective of performance appraisal is not evaluating but inspiring growth and aligning individual efforts toward organizational success. Choose which best fits your organization, and observe your workforce grow.

FAQs

What is performance appraisal?

Performance appraisal is that process of evaluating employee performance wherein strengths and areas for improvement can be identified as well as alignment with organizational goals. It is a critical tool for workforce development.

What are some performance appraisal examples?

Some forms of performance appraisal. Examples are 360-degree feedback, MBO, and BARS. Each offers a unique approach to appraising and developing worker performance.

How can performance appraisals boost workforce development?

Performance appraisals help identify skill gaps, promote self-knowledge, and relate individual goals with organizational goals. They spur growth and enhance communication between employees and managers.

What are some challenges in implementing modern appraisal methods?

Common problems include issues of giving and receiving feedback, such as resistance to change, biases in feedback, and lack of training. All these can be addressed by clear communication, proper tools, and consistent practices.

Subscribe to The HackerEarth Blog

Get expert tips, hacks, and how-tos from the world of tech recruiting to stay on top of your hiring!

Author
Nischal V Chadaga
Calendar Icon
November 19, 2024
Timer Icon
3 min read
Share

Hire top tech talent with our recruitment platform

Access Free Demo
Related reads

Discover more articles

Gain insights to optimize your developer recruitment process.

Vibe Coding: Shaping the Future of Software

A New Era of Code

Vibe coding is a new method of using natural language prompts and AI tools to generate code. I have seen firsthand that this change makes software more accessible to everyone. In the past, being able to produce functional code was a strong advantage for developers. Today, when code is produced quickly through AI, the true value lies in designing, refining, and optimizing systems. Our role now goes beyond writing code; we must also ensure that our systems remain efficient and reliable.

From Machine Language to Natural Language

I recall the early days when every line of code was written manually. We progressed from machine language to high-level programming, and now we are beginning to interact with our tools using natural language. This development does not only increase speed but also changes how we approach problem solving. Product managers can now create working demos in hours instead of weeks, and founders have a clearer way of pitching their ideas with functional prototypes. It is important for us to rethink our role as developers and focus on architecture and system design rather than simply on typing c

The Promise and the Pitfalls

I have experienced both sides of vibe coding. In cases where the goal was to build a quick prototype or a simple internal tool, AI-generated code provided impressive results. Teams have been able to test new ideas and validate concepts much faster. However, when it comes to more complex systems that require careful planning and attention to detail, the output from AI can be problematic. I have seen situations where AI produces large volumes of code that become difficult to manage without significant human intervention.

AI-powered coding tools like GitHub Copilot and AWS’s Q Developer have demonstrated significant productivity gains. For instance, at the National Australia Bank, it’s reported that half of the production code is generated by Q Developer, allowing developers to focus on higher-level problem-solving . Similarly, platforms like Lovable enable non-coders to build viable tech businesses using natural language prompts, contributing to a shift where AI-generated code reduces the need for large engineering teams. However, there are challenges. AI-generated code can sometimes be verbose or lack the architectural discipline required for complex systems. While AI can rapidly produce prototypes or simple utilities, building large-scale systems still necessitates experienced engineers to refine and optimize the code.​

The Economic Impact

The democratization of code generation is altering the economic landscape of software development. As AI tools become more prevalent, the value of average coding skills may diminish, potentially affecting salaries for entry-level positions. Conversely, developers who excel in system design, architecture, and optimization are likely to see increased demand and compensation.​
Seizing the Opportunity

Vibe coding is most beneficial in areas such as rapid prototyping and building simple applications or internal tools. It frees up valuable time that we can then invest in higher-level tasks such as system architecture, security, and user experience. When used in the right context, AI becomes a helpful partner that accelerates the development process without replacing the need for skilled engineers.

This is revolutionizing our craft, much like the shift from machine language to assembly to high-level languages did in the past. AI can churn out code at lightning speed, but remember, “Any fool can write code that a computer can understand. Good programmers write code that humans can understand.” Use AI for rapid prototyping, but it’s your expertise that transforms raw output into robust, scalable software. By honing our skills in design and architecture, we ensure our work remains impactful and enduring. Let’s continue to learn, adapt, and build software that stands the test of time.​

Ready to streamline your recruitment process? Get a free demo to explore cutting-edge solutions and resources for your hiring needs.

Guide to Conducting Successful System Design Interviews in 2025

What is Systems Design?

Systems Design is an all encompassing term which encapsulates both frontend and backend components harmonized to define the overall architecture of a product.

Designing robust and scalable systems requires a deep understanding of application, architecture and their underlying components like networks, data, interfaces and modules.

Systems Design, in its essence, is a blueprint of how software and applications should work to meet specific goals. The multi-dimensional nature of this discipline makes it open-ended – as there is no single one-size-fits-all solution to a system design problem.

What is a System Design Interview?

Conducting a System Design interview requires recruiters to take an unconventional approach and look beyond right or wrong answers. Recruiters should aim for evaluating a candidate’s ‘systemic thinking’ skills across three key aspects:

How they navigate technical complexity and navigate uncertainty
How they meet expectations of scale, security and speed
How they focus on the bigger picture without losing sight of details

This assessment of the end-to-end thought process and a holistic approach to problem-solving is what the interview should focus on.

What are some common topics for a System Design Interview

System design interview questions are free-form and exploratory in nature where there is no right or best answer to a specific problem statement. Here are some common questions:

How would you approach the design of a social media app or video app?

What are some ways to design a search engine or a ticketing system?

How would you design an API for a payment gateway?

What are some trade-offs and constraints you will consider while designing systems?

What is your rationale for taking a particular approach to problem solving?

Usually, interviewers base the questions depending on the organization, its goals, key competitors and a candidate’s experience level.

For senior roles, the questions tend to focus on assessing the computational thinking, decision making and reasoning ability of a candidate. For entry level job interviews, the questions are designed to test the hard skills required for building a system architecture.

The Difference between a System Design Interview and a Coding Interview

If a coding interview is like a map that takes you from point A to Z – a systems design interview is like a compass which gives you a sense of the right direction.

Here are three key difference between the two:

Coding challenges follow a linear interviewing experience i.e. candidates are given a problem and interaction with recruiters is limited. System design interviews are more lateral and conversational, requiring active participation from interviewers.

Coding interviews or challenges focus on evaluating the technical acumen of a candidate whereas systems design interviews are oriented to assess problem solving and interpersonal skills.

Coding interviews are based on a right/wrong approach with ideal answers to problem statements while a systems design interview focuses on assessing the thought process and the ability to reason from first principles.

How to Conduct an Effective System Design Interview

One common mistake recruiters make is that they approach a system design interview with the expectations and preparation of a typical coding interview.
Here is a four step framework technical recruiters can follow to ensure a seamless and productive interview experience:

Step 1: Understand the subject at hand

  • Develop an understanding of basics of system design and architecture
  • Familiarize yourself with commonly asked systems design interview questions
  • Read about system design case studies for popular applications
  • Structure the questions and problems by increasing magnitude of difficulty

Step 2: Prepare for the interview

  • Plan the extent of the topics and scope of discussion in advance
  • Clearly define the evaluation criteria and communicate expectations
  • Quantify constraints, inputs, boundaries and assumptions
  • Establish the broader context and a detailed scope of the exercise

Step 3: Stay actively involved

  • Ask follow-up questions to challenge a solution
  • Probe candidates to gauge real-time logical reasoning skills
  • Make it a conversation and take notes of important pointers and outcomes
  • Guide candidates with hints and suggestions to steer them in the right direction

Step 4: Be a collaborator

  • Encourage candidates to explore and consider alternative solutions
  • Work with the candidate to drill the problem into smaller tasks
  • Provide context and supporting details to help candidates stay on track
  • Ask follow-up questions to learn about the candidate’s experience

Technical recruiters and hiring managers should aim for providing an environment of positive reinforcement, actionable feedback and encouragement to candidates.

Evaluation Rubric for Candidates

Facilitate Successful System Design Interview Experiences with FaceCode

FaceCode, HackerEarth’s intuitive and secure platform, empowers recruiters to conduct system design interviews in a live coding environment with HD video chat.

FaceCode comes with an interactive diagram board which makes it easier for interviewers to assess the design thinking skills and conduct communication assessments using a built-in library of diagram based questions.

With FaceCode, you can combine your feedback points with AI-powered insights to generate accurate, data-driven assessment reports in a breeze. Plus, you can access interview recordings and transcripts anytime to recall and trace back the interview experience.

Learn how FaceCode can help you conduct system design interviews and boost your hiring efficiency.

How Candidates Use Technology to Cheat in Online Technical Assessments

Impact of Online Assessments in Technical Hiring


In a digitally-native hiring landscape, online assessments have proven to be both a boon and a bane for recruiters and employers.

The ease and efficiency of virtual interviews, take home programming tests and remote coding challenges is transformative. Around 82% of companies use pre-employment assessments as reliable indicators of a candidate's skills and potential.

Online skill assessment tests have been proven to streamline technical hiring and enable recruiters to significantly reduce the time and cost to identify and hire top talent.

In the realm of online assessments, remote assessments have transformed the hiring landscape, boosting the speed and efficiency of screening and evaluating talent. On the flip side, candidates have learned how to use creative methods and AI tools to cheat in tests.

As it turns out, technology that makes hiring easier for recruiters and managers - is also their Achilles' heel.

Cheating in Online Assessments is a High Stakes Problem



With the proliferation of AI in recruitment, the conversation around cheating has come to the forefront, putting recruiters and hiring managers in a bit of a flux.



According to research, nearly 30 to 50 percent of candidates cheat in online assessments for entry level jobs. Even 10% of senior candidates have been reportedly caught cheating.

The problem becomes twofold - if finding the right talent can be a competitive advantage, the consequences of hiring the wrong one can be equally damaging and counter-productive.

As per Forbes, a wrong hire can cost a company around 30% of an employee's salary - not to mention, loss of precious productive hours and morale disruption.

The question that arises is - "Can organizations continue to leverage AI-driven tools for online assessments without compromising on the integrity of their hiring process? "

This article will discuss the common methods candidates use to outsmart online assessments. We will also dive deep into actionable steps that you can take to prevent cheating while delivering a positive candidate experience.

Common Cheating Tactics and How You Can Combat Them


  1. Using ChatGPT and other AI tools to write code

    Copy-pasting code using AI-based platforms and online code generators is one of common cheat codes in candidates' books. For tackling technical assessments, candidates conveniently use readily available tools like ChatGPT and GitHub. Using these tools, candidates can easily generate solutions to solve common programming challenges such as:
    • Debugging code
    • Optimizing existing code
    • Writing problem-specific code from scratch
    Ways to prevent it
    • Enable full-screen mode
    • Disable copy-and-paste functionality
    • Restrict tab switching outside of code editors
    • Use AI to detect code that has been copied and pasted
  2. Enlist external help to complete the assessment


    Candidates often seek out someone else to take the assessment on their behalf. In many cases, they also use screen sharing and remote collaboration tools for real-time assistance.

    In extreme cases, some candidates might have an off-camera individual present in the same environment for help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Verify a candidate using video authentication
    • Restrict test access from specific IP addresses
    • Use online proctoring by taking snapshots of the candidate periodically
    • Use a 360 degree environment scan to ensure no unauthorized individual is present
  3. Using multiple devices at the same time


    Candidates attempting to cheat often rely on secondary devices such as a computer, tablet, notebook or a mobile phone hidden from the line of sight of their webcam.

    By using multiple devices, candidates can look up information, search for solutions or simply augment their answers.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Track mouse exit count to detect irregularities
    • Detect when a new device or peripheral is connected
    • Use network monitoring and scanning to detect any smart devices in proximity
    • Conduct a virtual whiteboard interview to monitor movements and gestures
  4. Using remote desktop software and virtual machines


    Tech-savvy candidates go to great lengths to cheat. Using virtual machines, candidates can search for answers using a secondary OS while their primary OS is being monitored.

    Remote desktop software is another cheating technique which lets candidates give access to a third-person, allowing them to control their device.

    With remote desktops, candidates can screen share the test window and use external help.

    Ways to prevent it
    • Restrict access to virtual machines
    • AI-based proctoring for identifying malicious keystrokes
    • Use smart browsers to block candidates from using VMs

Future-proof Your Online Assessments With HackerEarth

HackerEarth's AI-powered online proctoring solution is a tested and proven way to outsmart cheating and take preventive measures at the right stage. With HackerEarth's Smart Browser, recruiters can mitigate the threat of cheating and ensure their online assessments are accurate and trustworthy.
  • Secure, sealed-off testing environment
  • AI-enabled live test monitoring
  • Enterprise-grade, industry leading compliance
  • Built-in features to track, detect and flag cheating attempts
Boost your hiring efficiency and conduct reliable online assessments confidently with HackerEarth's revolutionary Smart Browser.
Top Products

Explore HackerEarth’s top products for Hiring & Innovation

Discover powerful tools designed to streamline hiring, assess talent efficiently, and run seamless hackathons. Explore HackerEarth’s top products that help businesses innovate and grow.
Frame
Hackathons
Engage global developers through innovation
Arrow
Frame 2
Assessments
AI-driven advanced coding assessments
Arrow
Frame 3
FaceCode
Real-time code editor for effective coding interviews
Arrow
Frame 4
L & D
Tailored learning paths for continuous assessments
Arrow
Get A Free Demo